Rules of Conduct

The place for discussion of all aspects of the gprejects.com website
Locked
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5922
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Rules of Conduct

Post by Nuppiz »

Based mostly on text written by Shinji and me:

1. General Conduct/Etiquette
(a) Many forum members are not native English speakers (though you wouldn't necessarily know it); please write full, clear sentences and do not use txt spk. Use punctuation and capital letters appropriately.
(b) Read back through your post before clicking 'Submit'. Make sure that what you post will contribute positively to the discussion at hand. Do not post anything just for the sake of increasing your post count. Because of this, nonsense threads like "word association" or "count to 10 000" are strictly prohibited. Also try to start as few new topics as possible, and use the search function to see if the topic you're posting already exists in some form.
(c) Further to point (b), do not post purely to incite controversy, or otherwise upset your fellow forumites. We're all here with to pursue a common interest - discussing those at the back of the grid, and otherwise taking a slightly offbeat look at Formula One - so there should be no need for conflict! Tensions might arise every now and then, but keep them at a moderate level - don't go into an all-out war that lasts for multiple pages in a topic.
(d) Many forum members are quite young. Therefore, please post only appropriate material with regard to language and content; it has been said countless times that this is a family forum!
(e) You should never need to reply in the same thread two-three times in a row within the same day, unless someone else posts there in the meantime. The 'Edit' function should be used to avoid making several posts in a row when one would function. Even if not done intentionally, it looks untidy, puts a load on our limited server reources and to some members this may look like cynical post count boosting.
(f) The authority of the Administrators and Moderators should be respected. The original job of user moderators was to keep spam from taking over the forums, but it has evolved to take on extra powers of making the forum a nicer place to be. If they decide you've done wrong, then you've most likely done wrong. If you still want to appeal, then you should contact either one of the Administrators.

2. Specific Points
(a) Please take note of the explanation of the purposes of each forum before opening a thread. Make sure you are posting it in the right place. This will prevent confusion and lessen the workload of moderators.
(b) Regular threads in the Paul Stoddart Memorial Forum such as Reject of the Race, Infinite Improbability Drive of the Race and Forum Ratings may only be opened once the race weekend has begun, simply because there usually is nothing to discuss in these topics beforehand. General race discussion threads (only one per race) may be started a few days before the race weekend starts, especially if there is interesting news to share considering the participants, race organisation etc.
(c) Do not post excessive amounts of large (more than 200x200 pixels) images. Some users are browsing this page on a very limited bandwith, for example on mobile devices, and it takes a long time for them to load up large quantities of data. If it's absolutely necessary to post more than five large images at once, please create a virtual gallery or album (most free image uploading sites offer this possibility) and link that to your post instead of including every image separatedly in your post.
(d) Do not post content from Autosport or other media outlets that is only available to subscribers of these services. Linking to the article is fine as other subscribers can read the article through the link (and in the case of free content, everyone can read it). You can also make a few referrals to the article's contents if it's absolutely vital for the discussion at hand. But under no circumstances should you copy-paste the entire contents of an article to the forum, as this violates copyright laws and can cause problems to the site owners.
(e) Before setting up a new series in the Perry McCarthy Memorial Forum, a user should gauge interest for it among other members of the forum, for example in the PMMF Planning Thread. Things can get complicated enough in there without new threads being formed that nobody wants to get involved in. Also, make sure you can run the series in the intended manner before taking in entries: this is to avoid participants being disappointed when a series is cancelled due to poor preparation. It's strongly encouraged to read the Introduction Thread before diving head-first into the subforum.
(f) Please adhere to the system of rules established in any virtual series you may find in the PMMF. Systems such as waiting lists for getting involved have evolved over time, and should be respected. By carefully reading the rules of every series before posting you can make life easier for everyone and others are likely to perceive you better than someone who repeatedly commits mistakes. Series' organisers may even kick members out from their series for repetitive rule infringement or failure to understand even the most simplest of rules.

Breaching any of these rules may result in a formal warning or even a temporary ban, depending on the severity of the offence.

Comments are welcome!
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
User avatar
Gerudo Dragon
Posts: 1766
Joined: 12 May 2012, 04:42
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Gerudo Dragon »

Nuppiz wrote:(e) The authority of the Administrators and Moderators must be respected, and their decisions are not to be challenged. The original job of user moderators was to keep spam from taking over the forums, but it has evolved to take on extra powers of making the forum a nicer place to be. If they decide you've done wrong, then you've done wrong.
Eh, everyone makes mistakes. Even mods. They can't always be right.
Trump 2016
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5922
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Nuppiz »

darkapprentice77 wrote:
Nuppiz wrote:(e) The authority of the Administrators and Moderators must be respected, and their decisions are not to be challenged. The original job of user moderators was to keep spam from taking over the forums, but it has evolved to take on extra powers of making the forum a nicer place to be. If they decide you've done wrong, then you've done wrong.
Eh, everyone makes mistakes. Even mods. They can't always be right.

Edited. The decisions made by Mods and Admins should be questioned in serious cases of misjustice.
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15416
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by dr-baker »

Maybe suggest that if one is to run a championship in PMMF, that one would be expected to run it oneself, unless somebody offers without being nominated?
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
UncreativeUsername37
Posts: 3420
Joined: 25 May 2012, 14:36
Location: Earth

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by UncreativeUsername37 »

dr-baker wrote:Maybe suggest that if one is to run a championship in PMMF, that one would be expected to run it oneself, unless somebody offers without being nominated?

Nuppiz wrote:(c) Before setting up a new series in the Perry McCarthy Memorial Forum, a user should gauge interest for it among other members of the forum, for example in the PMMF Planning Thread. Things can get complicated enough in there without new threads being formed that nobody wants to get involved in. Also, make sure you can run the series in the intended manner before taking in entries: this is to avoid participants being disappointed when a series is cancelled due to poor preparation.

I think that covers that already.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15416
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by dr-baker »

UgncreativeUsergname wrote:
dr-baker wrote:Maybe suggest that if one is to run a championship in PMMF, that one would be expected to run it oneself, unless somebody offers without being nominated?

Nuppiz wrote:(c) Before setting up a new series in the Perry McCarthy Memorial Forum, a user should gauge interest for it among other members of the forum, for example in the PMMF Planning Thread. Things can get complicated enough in there without new threads being formed that nobody wants to get involved in. Also, make sure you can run the series in the intended manner before taking in entries: this is to avoid participants being disappointed when a series is cancelled due to poor preparation.

I think that covers that already.

Just rereading it two or three times to make sure that I fully understand it, and to try and spot ambiguities, but with hindsight, I think it's fine...
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by eytl »

Thanks guys for getting the ball rolling on this. I'll review more closely ASAP, and give others the chance to contribute, but maybe leave it to either Jamie or me to post the final version as a global announcement.
User avatar
shinji
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4007
Joined: 18 May 2009, 17:02
Location: Hibernia

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by shinji »

Anyone have any other thoughts on this? I also would like to suggest this point that I'd written in the previous thread:

"Many forum members are quite young. Therefore, please post only appropriate material with regard to language and content; it has been said countless times that this is a family forum!"
Better than 'Tour in a suit case' Takagi.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5922
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Nuppiz »

Any more comments? If not, Enoch or Jamie can then put this up as a global announcement, to avoid further incidents.
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
User avatar
Klon
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 7178
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:07
Location: Schleswig-Holstein, FRG
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Klon »

Nuppiz wrote:Any more comments? If not, Enoch or Jamie can then put this up as a global announcement, to avoid further incidents.


Well, I for my part would highly consider rephrasing those sentences:

The authority of the Administrators and Moderators must be respected, and their decisions are not to be challenged lightly


There I say replace the "must be" with "ought to be" and cut the second part.

The decisions can, however, be challenged in serious cases of misjustice.


"Misjustice"? Really? Even though I am sure that your power will go to your head soon ( :P ) I think that's a bit over the top. Try something like "If you don't agree with their decision, you are free to post why but if they are not convinced, please do not continue with the criticised behaviour.".
User avatar
Gerudo Dragon
Posts: 1766
Joined: 12 May 2012, 04:42
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Gerudo Dragon »

Klon wrote:Well, I for my part would highly consider rephrasing those sentences:

The authority of the Administrators and Moderators must be respected, and their decisions are not to be challenged lightly


There I say replace the "must be" with "ought to be" and cut the second part.

The decisions can, however, be challenged in serious cases of misjustice.


"Misjustice"? Really? Even though I am sure that your power will go to your head soon ( :P ) I think that's a bit over the top. Try something like "If you don't agree with their decision, you are free to post why but if they are not convinced, please do not continue with the criticised behaviour.".
I would say that's a bit nitpicky... ;)
Trump 2016
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5922
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Nuppiz »

Klon wrote:
Nuppiz wrote:Any more comments? If not, Enoch or Jamie can then put this up as a global announcement, to avoid further incidents.


Well, I for my part would highly consider rephrasing those sentences:

The authority of the Administrators and Moderators must be respected, and their decisions are not to be challenged lightly


There I say replace the "must be" with "ought to be" and cut the second part.

The decisions can, however, be challenged in serious cases of misjustice.


"Misjustice"? Really? Even though I am sure that your power will go to your head soon ( :P ) I think that's a bit over the top. Try something like "If you don't agree with their decision, you are free to post why but if they are not convinced, please do not continue with the criticised behaviour.".

"The authority of the Administrators and Moderators should be respected."

"If you still want to appeal, then the public opinion shall decide what action to take."

Better? :P
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
User avatar
Klon
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 7178
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:07
Location: Schleswig-Holstein, FRG
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Klon »

Nuppiz wrote:"The authority of the Administrators and Moderators should be respected."

"If you still want to appeal, then the public opinion shall decide what action to take."

Better? :P


Excellent. :ugeek:
User avatar
shinji
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4007
Joined: 18 May 2009, 17:02
Location: Hibernia

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by shinji »

Any more going to be done about these proposals? I suppose the main problem would be adequately implementing them.
Better than 'Tour in a suit case' Takagi.
User avatar
go_Rubens
Posts: 3415
Joined: 25 Mar 2013, 21:12
Location: A raging river somewhere in the Eastern (cough) United States (cough)

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by go_Rubens »

shinji wrote:Any more going to be done about these proposals? I suppose the main problem would be adequately implementing them.


"agreeswithyourcomment" is going to stick his neck on the line and say that this is the main problem. ;)
Felipe Baby, Stay Cool

Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
User avatar
Gerudo Dragon
Posts: 1766
Joined: 12 May 2012, 04:42
Contact:

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by Gerudo Dragon »

Since this topic hasn't been pinned yet, I'm gonna bump it.
Trump 2016
User avatar
wsrgo
Posts: 651
Joined: 03 Apr 2013, 11:18
Location: India

Re: Rules of Conduct discussion

Post by wsrgo »

Nuppiz wrote:Branching this out into it's own topic, as the Moderator and Subforum Overhaul topic has kind of run its course already. Once we have agreed on a common set of rules, it will be stickied on this subforum so that new members (and why not old ones as well) can then find & read them easily.

Here's the current draft, based mostly on text written by Shinji and me:

1. General Conduct/Etiquette
(a) Many forum members are not native English speakers (though you wouldn't necessarily know it); please write full, clear sentences and do not use txt spk. Use punctuation and capital letters appropriately.
(b) Read back through your post before clicking 'Submit'. Make sure that what you post will contribute positively to the discussion at hand. Do not post anything just for the sake of increasing your post count. Nonsense threads like "word association game" and "count to 1 000 000" never contribute towards any sort of meaningful discussion and shouldn't be started in the first place.
(c) Further to point (b), do not post purely to incite controversy, or otherwise upset your fellow forumites. We're all here with to pursue a common interest - discussing those at the back of the grid, and otherwise taking a slightly offbeat look at Formula One - so there should be no need for conflict! Tensions might arise every now and then, but keep them at a moderate level - don't go into an all-out war that lasts for multiple pages in a topic.
(d) Many forum members are quite young. Therefore, please post only appropriate material with regard to language and content; it has been said countless times that this is a family forum! You should never need to reply in the same thread two-three times in a row within the same day, unless someone else posts there in the meantime.
(e) The 'Edit' function should be used to avoid making several posts in a row when one would function. Even if not done intentionally, to other members this may look like cynical post count boosting and can cause unnecessary conflict.
(f) The authority of the Administrators and Moderators should be respected. The original job of user moderators was to keep spam from taking over the forums, but it has evolved to take on extra powers of making the forum a nicer place to be. If they decide you've done wrong, then you've most likely done wrong. If you still want to appeal, then the public opinion shall decide what action to take.

2. Specific Points
(a) Please take note of the explanation of the purposes of each forum before opening a thread. Make sure you are posting it in the right place. This will prevent confusion and lessen the workload of moderators.
(b) Regular threads in the Paul Stoddart Memorial Forum such as Reject of the Race, Infinite Improbability Drive of the Race and Forum Ratings may only be opened once the race weekend has begun, simply because there usually is nothing to discuss in these topics beforehand. General race discussion threads (only one per race) may be started about a week before the race takes place, if there is interesting news to share considering the participants, race organisation etc.
(c) Before setting up a new series in the Perry McCarthy Memorial Forum, a user should gauge interest for it among other members of the forum, for example in the PMMF Planning Thread. Things can get complicated enough in there without new threads being formed that nobody wants to get involved in. Also, make sure you can run the series in the intended manner before taking in entries: this is to avoid participants being disappointed when a series is cancelled due to poor preparation.
(d) Please adhere to the system of rules established in the Reject World Racing Series (or RWRS) and related series, a universe all of its own to be found in the Andrea Sassetti Memorial Forum. Systems such as waiting lists for getting involved have evolved over time, and should be respected. Adhering to rules is not limited to the world of RWRS - by carefully reading the rules of every series before posting you can make life easier for everyone and others are likely to perceive you better than someone who repeatedly commits mistakes. Series' organisers may even kick members out from their series for repetitive rule infringement or failure to understand even the most simplest of rules.

Comments are welcome!


Thanks for making it all clear!! :)
eytl wrote:I agree. Especially when he talks about one's nerves sending signals 111a and 6783 etc. to the brain upon seeing Ericsson's hairdo.

He's got it all wrong. When I see Ericsson and Chilton's hairdos, the only signal going to my brain is 1049.
User avatar
apple2009
Posts: 406
Joined: 27 Aug 2013, 10:25

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by apple2009 »

Nonsense threads like "word association game" ... never contribute(s) towards any sort of meaningful discussion and shouldn't be started in the first place.

I disagree with this. Word association can be very fun and can reveal things you never would have guessed about people. :P :|
User avatar
Aerospeed
Posts: 4948
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 18:58
Location: In too much snow right now

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by Aerospeed »

apple2009 wrote:
Nonsense threads like "word association game" ... never contribute(s) towards any sort of meaningful discussion and shouldn't be started in the first place.

I disagree with this. Word association can be very fun and can reveal things you never would have guessed about people. :P :|


We must keep up with tradition!!!!! :lol: :D
Mistakes in potatoes will ALWAYS happen :P
Trulli bad puns...
IN JAIL NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM
User avatar
RonDenisDeletraz
Posts: 7380
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 08:21
Location: Flight 643
Contact:

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by RonDenisDeletraz »

Aerospeed wrote:
apple2009 wrote:
Nonsense threads like "word association game" ... never contribute(s) towards any sort of meaningful discussion and shouldn't be started in the first place.

I disagree with this. Word association can be very fun and can reveal things you never would have guessed about people. :P :|


We must keep up with tradition!!!!! :lol: :D

Say whatever you want about the thread itself, it is a good cure for boredom.
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either :P

tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15416
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by dr-baker »

The Word Association may inadvertantly get me to 10,000 posts quicker that I may otherwise wish. :? Need to control myself there.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
UncreativeUsername37
Posts: 3420
Joined: 25 May 2012, 14:36
Location: Earth

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by UncreativeUsername37 »

eurobrun wrote:Say whatever you want about the thread itself, it is a good cure for boredom.

I on the other hand agree with what Nuppiz said here.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
User avatar
RonDenisDeletraz
Posts: 7380
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 08:21
Location: Flight 643
Contact:

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by RonDenisDeletraz »

UgncreativeUsergname wrote:
eurobrun wrote:Say whatever you want about the thread itself, it is a good cure for boredom.

I on the other hand agree with what Nuppiz said here.

I said that based off personal experience, It worked for me.
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either :P

tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15416
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by dr-baker »

eurobrun wrote:
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:
eurobrun wrote:Say whatever you want about the thread itself, it is a good cure for boredom.

I on the other hand agree with what Nuppiz said here.

I said that based off personal experience, It worked for me.

I think it is now just a seasonal tradition of this forum now. If you don't care about how many posts you or others have, then artifically boosting it in a seasonal thread (that you can avoid reading) won't be of any concern to you. And if you do care about post counts, then that thread pulls pointless posts away from other threads. Essentially, the Word Association threads are harmless.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
UncreativeUsername37
Posts: 3420
Joined: 25 May 2012, 14:36
Location: Earth

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by UncreativeUsername37 »

dr-baker wrote:I think it is now just a seasonal tradition of this forum now. If you don't care about how many posts you or others have, then artifically boosting it in a seasonal thread (that you can avoid reading) won't be of any concern to you. And if you do care about post counts, then that thread pulls pointless posts away from other threads. Essentially, the Word Association threads are harmless.

It's like edit counts on a wiki, I guess. Adding content isn't the same as a grammar correction, etc., and some forum posts are more interesting/long than others.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
User avatar
DemocalypseNow
Posts: 13185
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 09:30
Location: Lost, send help
Contact:

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by DemocalypseNow »

The word association thread gets boring after a very short period of time. Very short. Although that's bad news for me, it means my ridiculous post count wasn't inflated by said thread and I really do post far too much.
Novitopoli wrote:Everytime someone orders at Pizza Hut, an Italian dies.
Novitopoli wrote:Juve's Triplete: Calciopoli, doping & Mafia connections.

Image Image
User avatar
HawkAussie
Posts: 1110
Joined: 21 Nov 2012, 04:59
Location: Tasmania

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by HawkAussie »

Too much, not enough I say
Officially Retired
User avatar
Salamander
Posts: 9570
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:59
Location: trapped on some prison island

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by Salamander »

HawkAussie wrote:Too much, not enough I say
What does that even mean? Image
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing I wouldn't be in Formula 1.
Everything's great.
I'm not surprised about anything.
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6428
Joined: 22 Apr 2012, 16:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by pasta_maldonado »

Salamander wrote:
HawkAussie wrote:Too much, not enough I say
What does that even mean? Image

What is love?
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by eytl »

Thanks again for keeping this going and bringing it to the forefront - and, indeed, making it a global announcement.

I think a few minor edits might be worthwhile but hopefully I'll get around to that shortly - on my list of things to do.

And for the record I must say I like the occasional word association game - indeed Jamie and I have even done that on a podcast, unless I'm very much mistaken! :lol:
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5922
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: Unofficially Official Rules of Conduct

Post by Nuppiz »

Giving this a bump as clearly certain people have forgotten certain crucial bits about it and should re-read the rules. Take this as a final warning - next time we won't just lock or delete posts or topics, but give personal punishments to the members involved as well.
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
Locked