CarlosFerreira wrote:Oh, look. It's not shoes!
You should have seen the last spam.
"Erection at nude beach"
Graphic.
*Strange 300th post there.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Oh, look. It's not shoes!
shinji wrote:CarlosFerreira wrote:Oh, look. It's not shoes!
You should have seen the last spam.
"Erection at nude beach"
Graphic.
*Strange 300th post there.
kostas22 wrote:Yeah, nice try spammers, but Renault management won't be reading this...go spam someone who cares!
On a more serious note, isnt it about time we introduced a new rule? First 3 posts by new users have to be approved by moderators before being accepted?
shinji wrote:kostas22 wrote:Yeah, nice try spammers, but Renault management won't be reading this...go spam someone who cares!
On a more serious note, isnt it about time we introduced a new rule? First 3 posts by new users have to be approved by moderators before being accepted?
Good thought, but J and E didn't make this board as far as I know, it's like a standard php, so I don't know how free they are to program rules. Would cut out spam anyway, but wouldn't really be fair to new members. Maybe just an obvious question asked when you sign in? Like "Where was Badoer when he retired from the '99 European GP?".
kostas22 wrote:Yes, get rid of that stupid image verification and replace it with another very easy question, like "Which team did Jean-Denis Deletraz drive for".
Did you know, it took me 4 attempts just to sign up to this forum!!!
CarlosFerreira wrote:I see two problems with those attempts: first, Jamie and Enoch have got lives to live, and can't really be bothered to be 24-on-24 hours online, chasing down spammers.
Second, we would be deprived of these wonderful pieces of writing, that so enlighten my days.
Dr. Helmut Marko wrote: Finally we have an Australian in the team who can start a race well and challenge Vettel.
shinji wrote:CarlosFerreira wrote:I see two problems with those attempts: first, Jamie and Enoch have got lives to live, and can't really be bothered to be 24-on-24 hours online, chasing down spammers.
Second, we would be deprived of these wonderful pieces of writing, that so enlighten my days.
You really didn't see Erection at nude beach. Those pictures traumatised me.
I'm in Transiton Year (also known colloquially by students as 'doss year' and 'waste of time'), I'd happily check over posts and monitor new users. It'd give me something to do. But I understand if Our Glorious Leaders want to retain complete control of the forums themselves.
CarlosFerreira wrote:shinji wrote:CarlosFerreira wrote:I see two problems with those attempts: first, Jamie and Enoch have got lives to live, and can't really be bothered to be 24-on-24 hours online, chasing down spammers.
Second, we would be deprived of these wonderful pieces of writing, that so enlighten my days.
You really didn't see Erection at nude beach. Those pictures traumatised me.
I'm in Transiton Year (also known colloquially by students as 'doss year' and 'waste of time'), I'd happily check over posts and monitor new users. It'd give me something to do. But I understand if Our Glorious Leaders want to retain complete control of the forums themselves.
You're going to spend your year off moderating an Internet forum?
IdodoMedJella wrote:Good day, sun shines!
There have been times of troubles when I didn't know about opportunities of getting high yields on investments. I was a dump and downright pessimistic person.
I have never imagined that there weren't any need in big starting capital.
Nowadays, I feel good, I started take up real income.
It gets down to choose a correct companion who uses your funds in a right way - that is incorporate it in real business, and shares the income with me.
You may ask, if there are such firms? I'm obliged to tell the truth, YES, there are. Please get to know about one of them.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Still no shoes. *sigh*
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
rolexwatch wrote:< Impressively large list of spam deleted! >
(Thanks Captain for making me delete it twice!!!)
mario wrote:I'm wondering what the hell has been going on in this thread [...] it's turned into a bizarre detour into mythical flying horses and the sort of search engine results that CoopsII is going to have a very hard time explaining ...
Captain Hammer wrote: If they took all the porn offline, I'm pretty sure there would only be one website, and it would be called "BRING BACK THE PORN!"
Nuppiz wrote:^ Epic spam
Jack O Malley wrote:Is this the definitive list of rejects f1 sponsors?
shinji wrote:Captain Hammer wrote: If they took all the porn offline, I'm pretty sure there would only be one website, and it would be called "BRING BACK THE PORN!"
THIEF! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUifLbLVXFo
mario wrote:I'm wondering what the hell has been going on in this thread [...] it's turned into a bizarre detour into mythical flying horses and the sort of search engine results that CoopsII is going to have a very hard time explaining ...
mario wrote:I'm wondering what the hell has been going on in this thread [...] it's turned into a bizarre detour into mythical flying horses and the sort of search engine results that CoopsII is going to have a very hard time explaining ...
Everything's great.Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing I wouldn't be in Formula 1.
Captain Hammer wrote:In before the lock!
thehemogoblin wrote:I think it's fitting that we get anti-depressant spam on the day that the Formula One season is decided.
Whis wrote:too late, Valencia has already done a disaster in Formula One fans...
Dr. Helmut Marko wrote: Finally we have an Australian in the team who can start a race well and challenge Vettel.