Wizzie wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:After you made that herbie reference, Why should i Bother?
Err, probably because it makes sense to fix it?
done
Wizzie wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:After you made that herbie reference, Why should i Bother?
Err, probably because it makes sense to fix it?
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:After you made that Herbie reference, why should I bother?
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:Newcomers, you may now submit new entries. Existing competitors can either wait or alter their entries.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
dr-baker wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:Newcomers, you may now submit new entries. Existing competitors can either wait or alter their entries.
What? So if you wish to continue with the same line-up, you have to get to the back of the line? Not even Bernie has thought of that!
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:dr-baker wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:Newcomers, you may now submit new entries. Existing competitors can either wait or alter their entries.
What? So if you wish to continue with the same line-up, you have to get to the back of the line? Not even Bernie has thought of that!
Unless you're altering or withdrawing your entry, please wait til the season begins again.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
dr-baker wrote:dr-baker wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:
What? So if you wish to continue with the same line-up, you have to get to the back of the line? Not even Bernie has thought of that!
Unless you're altering or withdrawing your entry, please wait til the season begins again.
WHAT??! The season will begin before I can enter?!
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:Unless you're altering or withdrawing your entry, please wait til the season begins again.
No but if you want to enter, enter.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
Klon, on Alt-F1 wrote: I like to think it's more poker than gambling, though.
kevinbotz wrote:Can you give us the performance parameters of each car, so that this season doesn't result in total domination by one manufacturer again? And please tell me that the performance disparity between Super Touring and Class B has been redressed.
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:kevinbotz wrote:Can you give us the performance parameters of each car, so that this season doesn't result in total domination by one manufacturer again? And please tell me that the performance disparity between Super Touring and Class B has been redressed.
Results are based on car horsepower.
Klon, on Alt-F1 wrote: I like to think it's more poker than gambling, though.
kevinbotz wrote:umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:kevinbotz wrote:Can you give us the performance parameters of each car, so that this season doesn't result in total domination by one manufacturer again? And please tell me that the performance disparity between Super Touring and Class B has been redressed.
Results are based on car horsepower.
So, provide us with the relevant data regarding the performance of the cars. Beyond that, if performance is solely determined by power figures, what exactly is the point of including the Super Touring class? Super Touring cars were generally limited to 300 odd horsepower, but enjoyed significant aerodynamic and construction advantages over non-Super Touring machines. If that performance metric, and the concomitant corollaries associated with that metric, are absent from the simulation, then Super Touring, never mind any other vehicle with a horsepower deficit, will have been rendered entirely irrelevant. Under these conditions, the rational decision for any team would be to opt for the most powerful car, presently the Class B BMW M3, which would inevitably result in a grid comprised solely of the same make.
If this is not the case, and there do exist separate performance parameters (e.g. grip, aerodynamic performance, reliability, etc.), then please clarify as soon as possible.
Mexicola wrote:shinji wrote:Mexicola wrote: I'd rather listen to a dog lick its balls. Each to their own, I guess.
Does listening to a dog licking its balls get you excited?
That's between me and my internet service provider.
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:kevinbotz wrote:Can you give us the performance parameters of each car, so that this season doesn't result in total domination by one manufacturer again? And please tell me that the performance disparity between Super Touring and Class B has been redressed.
Results are based on car horsepower.
Klon, on Alt-F1 wrote: I like to think it's more poker than gambling, though.
umatbru [aka nonameyet] wrote:By default, results are based on horsepower, but in the case of the Class B BMW's i am going to add restrictor plates them to prevent the from dominating the season like last year.
Mexicola wrote:shinji wrote:Mexicola wrote: I'd rather listen to a dog lick its balls. Each to their own, I guess.
Does listening to a dog licking its balls get you excited?
That's between me and my internet service provider.