went wrote:According to Sutil, Bianchi hit the crane.
Oh dear
Rio Haryanto for the win! He upon seeing me accidentaly paint Belgian flag rotated 90 deg to right tommykl returns from the bathroom tommykl reads the chat logs tommykl has a stroke
Good news is that they have put him in heli inside 10 min, he must be okay now. If it was serious than there would have been more time spent on track for resuscitation.
Looking at the a first image of Bianchi's car..... Oh my God
Rio Haryanto for the win! He upon seeing me accidentaly paint Belgian flag rotated 90 deg to right tommykl returns from the bathroom tommykl reads the chat logs tommykl has a stroke
went wrote:Bianchi is unconscious. He was sent to the hospital by car because the helicopter can't fly safely.
Oh dear...
What an idiot FIA. If heli can't take off why we're they racing. In past they have stopped why not today.
Yesterday, after qualifying, Kravitz mentioned that the local authorities had promised that, if any driver was injured and the medical helicopter couldn't fly, that they would provide a police escort for any ambulance convoy, which appears to have convinced the FIA that they would be able to race.
Unfortunately, it is one of those contingencies that you would have hoped would never have to be put into action, and it is casting a very long shadow over what had been an enjoyable race until that point - the situation does not sound good for Bianchi, and I can only hope that the initial reports are making the situation sound worse than it actually is.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning: "The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
Whatever the aftermath of all this is, I suspect a lot will be made of the conditions being too poor for the helicopter to fly. No doubt we'll see a rule change to allow FIA to overrule all other parties when considering rescheduling a race. Should have been run earlier in the day.
With all that said, obviously hoping Bianchi is okay. The most important thing we can all take from this as ordinary spectators is to not get hysterical and not start a blame game. In those sort of situations, no-one is at fault. The truck needed to move the Sauber, and it's unfortunate that for Jules, he crashed right where it was. If it hadn't been the crane, he might have hit the Sauber, and possibly even Sutil if he hadn't got out in time.
It's one thing to try and allow a car recovery in the dry, but i feel it was crazy not to call a SC immediately for Sutil's crash in the wet on such a fast corner.
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet" -Abraham Lincoln
AndreaModa wrote:Whatever the aftermath of all this is, I suspect a lot will be made of the conditions being too poor for the helicopter to fly. No doubt we'll see a rule change to allow FIA to overrule all other parties when considering rescheduling a race. Should have been run earlier in the day.
With all that said, obviously hoping Bianchi is okay. The most important thing we can all take from this as ordinary spectators is to not get hysterical and not start a blame game. In those sort of situations, no-one is at fault. The truck needed to move the Sauber, and it's unfortunate that for Jules, he crashed right where it was. If it hadn't been the crane, he might have hit the Sauber, and possibly even Sutil if he hadn't got out in time.
That said, Martin Brundle has been wincing for *years* every time one of those trucks is on track - with so much specialist racing and safety equipment used in Formula 1, it's always alarming to see these huge pieces of construction equipment lumbering about on the circuit.
TheFlyingCaterham wrote:Really FIA? Bianchi might be injured. People want to know what happened. Why would you cover it up?
Standard procedure. Formula One is watched by children, so it's really in everyone's interest to keep the traumatic pictures at a minimum. We will learn soon enough the full extent of any potential injuries.
fjackdaw wrote:I did wonder why they cut to seemingly pointless footage of the Sauber garage for so long just before the red flag.
Stewards used a sheet to cover treatment of Bianchi behind his car in order to block tv from seeing any pictures.
Really FIA? Bianchi might be injured. People want to know what happened. Why would you cover it up?
Bianchi IS seriously injured.
They dont show it because it generally isnt very tactful to show material of potentially a fatal accident in live feed. And tthe FIA are exactly right to do that.
If my memory serves right (could be wrong too), checo's crash at Monaco quali 2011 wasn't instantly shown either
In 1994 Martin Brundle went off at the same place IIRC and nearly hit a tractor/caterpillar. Instead he collided with a marshall, causing the marshall a horrendous leg injury. Martin has said ad nauseum how he thought he was going to die as he aquaplaned towards the tractor and he could have lost his life. And in 2007 at the Nurburgring, the SC quickly scampered out of the way when Vitantonio Liuzzi spun off, nearly hitting the SC and kissing the back of a tractor. Both came within yards/inches of disaster.
Don't want to be morbid BTW so I'll delete this post if it upsets anybody.
Check out the position of the sun on 2 August at 20:08 in my garden
Allard Kalff in 1994 wrote:OH!! Schumacher in the wall! Right in front of us, Michael Schumacher is in the wall! He's hit the pitwall, he c... Ah, it's Jos Verstappen.
fjackdaw wrote:I did wonder why they cut to seemingly pointless footage of the Sauber garage for so long just before the red flag.
Stewards used a sheet to cover treatment of Bianchi behind his car in order to block tv from seeing any pictures.
Really FIA? Bianchi might be injured. People want to know what happened. Why would you cover it up?
They also did that when Schumacher crashed in 1999. Unless it is confirmed that a driver is OK, they won't show him. They have bad memories about doing so in 1994.
fjackdaw wrote:I did wonder why they cut to seemingly pointless footage of the Sauber garage for so long just before the red flag.
Stewards used a sheet to cover treatment of Bianchi behind his car in order to block tv from seeing any pictures.
Really FIA? Bianchi might be injured. People want to know what happened. Why would you cover it up?
They don't let the drivers use even mild swear words on the podium, they aren't going to show what is potentially a driver dying in what must have been a massively destructive crash. This isn't Game of Thrones.
Rosberg and Vettel sounded close to tears when being interviewed by the BBC.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
AndreaModa wrote:Whatever the aftermath of all this is, I suspect a lot will be made of the conditions being too poor for the helicopter to fly. No doubt we'll see a rule change to allow FIA to overrule all other parties when considering rescheduling a race. Should have been run earlier in the day.
With all that said, obviously hoping Bianchi is okay. The most important thing we can all take from this as ordinary spectators is to not get hysterical and not start a blame game. In those sort of situations, no-one is at fault. The truck needed to move the Sauber, and it's unfortunate that for Jules, he crashed right where it was. If it hadn't been the crane, he might have hit the Sauber, and possibly even Sutil if he hadn't got out in time.
That said, Martin Brundle has been wincing for *years* every time one of those trucks is on track - with so much specialist racing and safety equipment used in Formula 1, it's always alarming to see these huge pieces of construction equipment lumbering about on the circuit.
On the other hand, I am struggling to see how you could easily move a car that has crashed, and therefore cannot be easily wheeled away, without some sort of mobile crane.
Having a somewhat cumbersome mobile crane near the edge of the track is not an ideal situation, and it is true that in the past we have had a few close calls when marshals have been trying to remove a stricken car in damp conditions. However, I'm not sure what alternatives could easily be used to replace the mobile cranes - perhaps you could try to clad the outside of the crane with some sort of protective padding, but that could then compromise the safe working of the crane for the operators and the marshals around it, so I don't think there is an easy way out of that situation.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning: "The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
AndreaModa wrote:Whatever the aftermath of all this is, I suspect a lot will be made of the conditions being too poor for the helicopter to fly. No doubt we'll see a rule change to allow FIA to overrule all other parties when considering rescheduling a race. Should have been run earlier in the day.
With all that said, obviously hoping Bianchi is okay. The most important thing we can all take from this as ordinary spectators is to not get hysterical and not start a blame game. In those sort of situations, no-one is at fault. The truck needed to move the Sauber, and it's unfortunate that for Jules, he crashed right where it was. If it hadn't been the crane, he might have hit the Sauber, and possibly even Sutil if he hadn't got out in time.
That said, Martin Brundle has been wincing for *years* every time one of those trucks is on track - with so much specialist racing and safety equipment used in Formula 1, it's always alarming to see these huge pieces of construction equipment lumbering about on the circuit.
On the other hand, I am struggling to see how you could easily move a car that has crashed, and therefore cannot be easily wheeled away, without some sort of mobile crane.
Having a somewhat cumbersome mobile crane near the edge of the track is not an ideal situation, and it is true that in the past we have had a few close calls when marshals have been trying to remove a stricken car in damp conditions. However, I'm not sure what alternatives could easily be used to replace the mobile cranes - perhaps you could try to clad the outside of the crane with some sort of protective padding, but that could then compromise the safe working of the crane for the operators and the marshals around it, so I don't think there is an easy way out of that situation.
The alternative is calling a safety car, not about the type of equipment used.
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet" -Abraham Lincoln