2023 Discussion Thread

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1
Post Reply
User avatar
noiceinmydrink
Posts: 338
Joined: 30 Sep 2012, 15:40
Location: ziggurat

2023 Discussion Thread

Post by noiceinmydrink »

Haven't seen one opened yet so here goes; The Twenty Twenty Three Year of the Max Probably Definitely Maybe thread.

To kick off; Franz Tost has confirmed that Alpha Tauri is categorically not for sale. For now, anyway. The inital rumour I believe was they had to move their ops to England or sell up.

Would be a real shame for the team to go to anyone other than Minardi himself frankly, bearing in mind that the team isn't Minardi but same factory and I'm sure some of the same people. Close enough.
User avatar
kronatherm
Posts: 11
Joined: 19 Jan 2022, 12:50

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by kronatherm »

I think this season is going to like the last one, with RBR just dominating and a clear 1-2 dynamic. Maybe the punishment for their overspending will catch up with them by the halfway point, when they can't develop as much, but right now it looks like RBR have cheated and gotten away with it quite frankly
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15428
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by dr-baker »

noiceinmydrink wrote: 01 Mar 2023, 11:44

Would be a real shame for the team to go to anyone other than Minardi himself frankly, bearing in mind that the team isn't Minardi but same factory and I'm sure some of the same people. Close enough.
Or possibly Paul Stoddart?
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
noiceinmydrink
Posts: 338
Joined: 30 Sep 2012, 15:40
Location: ziggurat

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by noiceinmydrink »

dr-baker wrote: 01 Mar 2023, 18:11 Or possibly Paul Stoddart?
Ah yes, how could I forget our blessed E U R O P E A N Minardi!
User avatar
Paul Hayes
Posts: 1101
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 19:54

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Paul Hayes »

An ominous-looking start to the season for everyone who isn't Red Bull, but at least Alonso provided some great entertainment. It's amazing to me to think that when he made his F1 debut I was a 17-year-old sixth former, and now he's making the podium when I'm a 39-year-old middle-aged man!
User avatar
RAK
Posts: 964
Joined: 30 May 2009, 16:35

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by RAK »

I'd call that a race defined more by its failures than by its successes; while Alonso did a fantastic job pulling himself to P3, Sargeant had a solid debut and Albon, Gasly and Stroll scored reasonably given their relative circumstances, I was more taken by both McLarens with severe reliability problems, Leclerc suffering from what almost seems like Ferrari's customary foul-up of the race and Ocon's abysmal, penalty-prone drive.
Predicament Predictions Champion, 2011, 2018, 2019

They weren't the world's most competent team,
In fact, to be believed, their results must be seen,
Lola,
M-Mastercard Lola,
L, O, L, A, Lola!
User avatar
Rob Dylan
Posts: 3477
Joined: 18 May 2014, 15:34
Location: Andy Warhol's basement

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Rob Dylan »

What surprised me most was just how ambivalent the whole pub atmosphere was when Leclerc's engine died. Nobody jumped up and shouted, everyone just shrugged and accepted that this always happens.
Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!
User avatar
Spectoremg
Posts: 513
Joined: 27 Dec 2014, 21:39
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Spectoremg »

I've decided I won't be watching the Saudi GP. The fee should be wedged into the severed hands this disgusting regime considers to be justice.
User avatar
noiceinmydrink
Posts: 338
Joined: 30 Sep 2012, 15:40
Location: ziggurat

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by noiceinmydrink »

Dear God, this drivel itself ought to be an early contender for Reject of the Year. Is this some kind of joke?

"Oh no! We're not first! Taste my champagne tears!"

Utter rubbish.
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

noiceinmydrink wrote: 11 Mar 2023, 15:18 Dear God, this drivel itself ought to be an early contender for Reject of the Year. Is this some kind of joke?

"Oh no! We're not first! Taste my champagne tears!"

Utter rubbish.
Is it any worse than the repeated promises by Ferrari to move forward after a period of restructuring and consolidation?
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
noiceinmydrink
Posts: 338
Joined: 30 Sep 2012, 15:40
Location: ziggurat

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by noiceinmydrink »

mario wrote: 14 Mar 2023, 08:04 Is it any worse than the repeated promises by Ferrari to move forward after a period of restructuring and consolidation?
I'd say it is worse because the "next year" Ferrari thing at least gets a chuckle from me and I'm not picturing a mass of violins when their PR statements are being penned. Mercedes and Toto just go so over the top with anger and sorrow when things don't work out for them, and this was just after one race.

Of course a team will put out a "we're dissappointed" statement to the press when they're going through a rough period or have a bad race. But when a corporation tries to have feelings, I get a feeling too; it's called being physically ill.
User avatar
Wallio
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 2624
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 22:54
Location: The Wyoming Valley, PA

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Wallio »

Eh, the Merc "letter" was pretty cringeworthy, but they had to say SOMETHING. Last year they seemed......content? With where they were. This at least is a response to Sir Lewis throwing them under the bus.
Professional Historian/Retired Drag Racer/Whiskey Enthusiast

"He makes the move on the outside, and knowing George as we do, he's probably on the radio right now telling the team how great he is." - James Hinchcliffe on George Russell
User avatar
Rob Dylan
Posts: 3477
Joined: 18 May 2014, 15:34
Location: Andy Warhol's basement

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Rob Dylan »

Wallio wrote: 14 Mar 2023, 21:45 Eh, the Merc "letter" was pretty cringeworthy, but they had to say SOMETHING. Last year they seemed......content? With where they were. This at least is a response to Sir Lewis throwing them under the bus.
I still think the most bizarre behaviour from the team, or at least the behaviour I condone the least was when they prostrated themselves in gushing apologies to Lewis when they gave him the first subpar strategy of his seven years with the team, meaning he could only finish a poor, measly fifth. All of this was done for bloody days after the event and totally overshadowed the fact that, you know, his teammate Bottas won the race...
Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!
Alextrax52
Posts: 2943
Joined: 17 Apr 2013, 20:06
Location: Bromborough near Liverpool

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Alextrax52 »

Rob Dylan wrote: 15 Mar 2023, 15:01
Wallio wrote: 14 Mar 2023, 21:45 Eh, the Merc "letter" was pretty cringeworthy, but they had to say SOMETHING. Last year they seemed......content? With where they were. This at least is a response to Sir Lewis throwing them under the bus.
I still think the most bizarre behaviour from the team, or at least the behaviour I condone the least was when they prostrated themselves in gushing apologies to Lewis when they gave him the first subpar strategy of his seven years with the team, meaning he could only finish a poor, measly fifth. All of this was done for bloody days after the event and totally overshadowed the fact that, you know, his teammate Bottas won the race...
I thought the worst of it was at the end of Imola last year when Toto Wolff came over Hamilton’s radio to apologize for his disastrous on merit 13th place all while Russell had just taken the other car to 4th. What is it about Hamilton that people feel the need to wrap him up in cotton wool at the merest hint of adversity?

Mind you the way Red Bull have mollycoddled Verstappen like they used to with Vettel runs it pretty close.
User avatar
Ducktanian
Posts: 315
Joined: 28 Mar 2010, 14:45

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Ducktanian »

It makes sense with how highly these star drivers are valued. I can easily imagine Red Bull having nightmares of losing Verstappen. I do wonder how much the drivers are aware of this and how much they exploit it.
I can kinda understand Toto feeling that he needs to ensure that Hamilton doesnt ditch them like he did with McLaren.
Murray Walker: "A lot of people here are really debating whether Ricardo Rosset is Formula 1 material"
Martin Brundle: "Well, it's a fairly short debate, Murray".
User avatar
Row Man Gross-Gene
Posts: 756
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 18:48
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Row Man Gross-Gene »

I was happy to see that Hamilton continues to criticize the Saudi GP. Not much to say other than I'm glad someone's keeping visibility on this.
It's just unbelievable...that Formula 1 could be such a ridiculous melange of idiots.

-Jamie McGregor

Check out my colo(u)ring pages website: http://sites.google.com/site/carcoloringpages/
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

Whilst some have joked about Mercedes and their behaviour, the flip side to that is that they're not engaging in a blame game - unlike Tost, who is currently in the process of throwing his entire team under the bus.

In Jeddah, he's been complaining that the engineers told him that they were making good progress, but since the car is not competitive, he repeatedly complained that "I don’t trust them any more", basically accused them of faking the data comparison between their 2022 and 2023 car to make their 2023 car look better than it is and openly questioned whether they were going in the right direction in developing the car. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/tost- ... /10444854/

It's a really scummy move from Tost - it's one thing to say that you're uncompetitive, but when you're telling much of the team "you're a load of liars and you're crap", that must be utterly destroying morale within the team.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
RAK
Posts: 964
Joined: 30 May 2009, 16:35

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by RAK »

Verstappen's reliability problems in qualifying indicate that Mercedes treating them like Red Bull is unassailable is a bit of an overreaction.
Predicament Predictions Champion, 2011, 2018, 2019

They weren't the world's most competent team,
In fact, to be believed, their results must be seen,
Lola,
M-Mastercard Lola,
L, O, L, A, Lola!
User avatar
Paul Hayes
Posts: 1101
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 19:54

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Paul Hayes »

I still find it hard not to see Verstappen coming through to win from 15th tomorrow, such is his pace advantage, as we saw on similar occasions last season.
User avatar
kronatherm
Posts: 11
Joined: 19 Jan 2022, 12:50

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by kronatherm »

Verstappen is 100% winning tomorrow barring mechanical problems. 1s per lap over the rest of the field and good straight line speed. Only question is whether Perez behaves himself.
User avatar
Paul Hayes
Posts: 1101
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 19:54

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Paul Hayes »

I was very surprised and impressed that Perez managed to maintain such a gap to Verstappen and take the win. Based on everything that's happened with them as team mates so far, and their relative performances in the previous race, I expected Verstappen to cruise right past him. I'm still very doubtful Perez is capable of taking a championship fight to him across the course of the season, but at least there's some sort of fight going on at this early stage.

Which seems to be more than can be said for Ferrari at the moment - they just seemed to completely disappear.
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

So, the organisers of the Las Vegas GP announced recently that they had put 1,800 general admission tickets up for sale at $500, which have now all sold out.

With that in mind, the organisers have now announced that they will be making more general admission tickets available, and that those tickets will be below $500. However, what they have also confirmed is that those additional general admission tickets will not include a view of the track - i.e. you're not buying the ticket for the race itself, but are instead buying it for what the organisers call a "one-of-a kind watch party" that gives you access to the side events that are taking place alongside the race.

Whilst the tactic around the Miami GP seemed to revolve around selling the image of the event itself, rather than the actual race, this seems to take it to the logical extreme by selling the setting of the race weekend and not the race itself. I guess that perhaps sums the commercial attitude that has entered the sport under Liberty Media these days.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Rob Dylan
Posts: 3477
Joined: 18 May 2014, 15:34
Location: Andy Warhol's basement

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Rob Dylan »

I'm sure those tickets will give you exclusive access to the casinos, where you can lose more of your money for no reason!
Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

Rob Dylan wrote: 25 Mar 2023, 12:05 I'm sure those tickets will give you exclusive access to the casinos, where you can lose more of your money for no reason!
It seems most casinos have decided to create their own exclusive packages - it looks like they're not going after the sort of person who spends $500 on a ticket, they're going after the sort of person whom is happy to spend around $10,000 - $30,000 at the lower end, through those spending $150,000 and all the way up to $1 - 5 million.

There was talk that the casinos themselves have been buying a large number of tickets, or perhaps are cutting direct deals with Liberty Media for an allocation of tickets, which are then being repackaged by themselves into "luxury weekend events". Basically, their logic seems to be that the big money is in selling those packages themselves, with a rather hefty mark up built into the sales price.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Row Man Gross-Gene
Posts: 756
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 18:48
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Row Man Gross-Gene »

mario wrote: 25 Mar 2023, 21:06
Rob Dylan wrote: 25 Mar 2023, 12:05 I'm sure those tickets will give you exclusive access to the casinos, where you can lose more of your money for no reason!
It seems most casinos have decided to create their own exclusive packages - it looks like they're not going after the sort of person who spends $500 on a ticket, they're going after the sort of person whom is happy to spend around $10,000 - $30,000 at the lower end, through those spending $150,000 and all the way up to $1 - 5 million.

There was talk that the casinos themselves have been buying a large number of tickets, or perhaps are cutting direct deals with Liberty Media for an allocation of tickets, which are then being repackaged by themselves into "luxury weekend events". Basically, their logic seems to be that the big money is in selling those packages themselves, with a rather hefty mark up built into the sales price.

I don't really like this kind of thing going on, but if it's the price we have to pay to keep the Saudis from just outright buying the sport from Liberty, I'll put up with it. I'd rather have a few "rampant late-stage capitalism races" than the Saudi PIF in charge of the entire thing.

I realize that's pretty pessimistic, but I guess that's how I'm feeling right now. Liberty's been better than Bernie (and they're much better than the PIF would be), but they're still a corporation after all.
It's just unbelievable...that Formula 1 could be such a ridiculous melange of idiots.

-Jamie McGregor

Check out my colo(u)ring pages website: http://sites.google.com/site/carcoloringpages/
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

Row Man Gross-Gene wrote: 27 Mar 2023, 16:56
mario wrote: 25 Mar 2023, 21:06
Rob Dylan wrote: 25 Mar 2023, 12:05 I'm sure those tickets will give you exclusive access to the casinos, where you can lose more of your money for no reason!
It seems most casinos have decided to create their own exclusive packages - it looks like they're not going after the sort of person who spends $500 on a ticket, they're going after the sort of person whom is happy to spend around $10,000 - $30,000 at the lower end, through those spending $150,000 and all the way up to $1 - 5 million.

There was talk that the casinos themselves have been buying a large number of tickets, or perhaps are cutting direct deals with Liberty Media for an allocation of tickets, which are then being repackaged by themselves into "luxury weekend events". Basically, their logic seems to be that the big money is in selling those packages themselves, with a rather hefty mark up built into the sales price.

I don't really like this kind of thing going on, but if it's the price we have to pay to keep the Saudis from just outright buying the sport from Liberty, I'll put up with it. I'd rather have a few "rampant late-stage capitalism races" than the Saudi PIF in charge of the entire thing.

I realize that's pretty pessimistic, but I guess that's how I'm feeling right now. Liberty's been better than Bernie (and they're much better than the PIF would be), but they're still a corporation after all.
I do feel that Liberty Media's overall impact is rather mixed - in some areas better, but in others worse. The rush to get in on the cryptocurrency bubble in particular is looking particularly questionable, given their main sponsor has since been getting in trouble with the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK - the FCA banned two of their adverts for deliberately misleading investors about the risks around cryptocurrencies - and the same exchange is now facing questions about it's solvency.

Moving in a different direction, some here might have heard that McLaren have fired James Key from his role as technical director. They have also effectively split the role of technical director in three, with Peter Prodromou now becoming the technical director for aerodynamics, Neil Houldey being appointed to the role of technical director for engineering and design and David Sanchez - a former McLaren employee who had moved to Ferrari, and has now been tempted back - taking on the role of technical director for car concept and performance, although he is on "gardening leave" until January 2024. https://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/35 ... eaves-team

Some have commented that it feels like a return in some ways to the "matrix management" system that McLaren used in the past, although others have commented that it looks more akin to how Ferrari have structured their team (where, rather than having an overarching technical director, they've had technical directors of individual departments that report to the team principle).

Either way, there were reports prior to the season that there were major concerns about the development direction that the MCL-60 was going in, and questions over whether the planned major upgrade for Baku was going to give the team the boost in performance they wanted. Whilst Key was respected for what he managed to do at smaller teams, particularly Toro Rosso, things just don't seem to have worked out at McLaren - although splitting his role suggests there may be wider changes to come at McLaren.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Rob Dylan
Posts: 3477
Joined: 18 May 2014, 15:34
Location: Andy Warhol's basement

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Rob Dylan »

Yeah, the replacement of his job highly implies that it is the position, not just the person, that has been seen as a mistake by those in charge. It's always a tricky balance to manage, though: having one talented person putting the right emphasis on the right resources can be brilliant, but it can also lead to development in the wrong areas with poor results. Having lots of individual power structures in each department can reap benefits by giving more representation to the lower levels on the hierarchy, but it can also descend into a shouting competition where every director thinks their department is the most important in the team. If that is the way Ferrari have been operating all these years, it may explain why the team seems to always have this sense of stagnation, poor development, and a lack of self-awareness as to what needs to change to improve their fortunes.
Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!
User avatar
RAK
Posts: 964
Joined: 30 May 2009, 16:35

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by RAK »

mario wrote: 27 Mar 2023, 21:26The rush to get in on the cryptocurrency bubble in particular is looking particularly questionable, given their main sponsor has since been getting in trouble with the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK - the FCA banned two of their adverts for deliberately misleading investors about the risks around cryptocurrencies - and the same exchange is now facing questions about it's solvency.
I've been a deep cryptocurrency skeptic for a long time for both technical and economic reasons (almost as long as cryptocurrencies have existed, in fact), so seeing Formula One get roped into advertising them has always been galling to me. There are various bingo cards online with lists of exchanges or overtly cryptocurrency-friendly entities and when they've closed or got into trouble; I have a feeling that several of the exchanges advertised in Formula One will see the same fate. And then, it'll likely look like Rich Energy on steroids.
Predicament Predictions Champion, 2011, 2018, 2019

They weren't the world's most competent team,
In fact, to be believed, their results must be seen,
Lola,
M-Mastercard Lola,
L, O, L, A, Lola!
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15428
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by dr-baker »

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-b ... /10450137/

The FIA wants to clamp down on the rule forbidding people from climbing the pitfall, with celebrations at the end of races coming to their minds. Whatever next?
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
Row Man Gross-Gene
Posts: 756
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 18:48
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Row Man Gross-Gene »

dr-baker wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 17:37 https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-b ... /10450137/

The FIA wants to clamp down on the rule forbidding people from climbing the pitfall, with celebrations at the end of races coming to their minds. Whatever next?

As a general rule, I'm in favor of more safety, I just wonder if this results in more safety. How many people have been hurt climbing up there? In the comments under the story someone commented how tragic it would be for someone to fall into the track and get run over, but I question whether anyone gets up high enough to fall inward. If anyone's been hurt, it's likely that they fell into the pit lane and hurt themselves that way. Which, if it's happening, yeah, I understand the decision, but it also kind of sucks to be taking away some expression.
It's just unbelievable...that Formula 1 could be such a ridiculous melange of idiots.

-Jamie McGregor

Check out my colo(u)ring pages website: http://sites.google.com/site/carcoloringpages/
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15428
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by dr-baker »

Row Man Gross-Gene wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 18:32
dr-baker wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 17:37 https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-b ... /10450137/

The FIA wants to clamp down on the rule forbidding people from climbing the pitfall, with celebrations at the end of races coming to their minds. Whatever next?

As a general rule, I'm in favor of more safety, I just wonder if this results in more safety. How many people have been hurt climbing up there? In the comments under the story someone commented how tragic it would be for someone to fall into the track and get run over, but I question whether anyone gets up high enough to fall inward. If anyone's been hurt, it's likely that they fell into the pit lane and hurt themselves that way. Which, if it's happening, yeah, I understand the decision, but it also kind of sucks to be taking away some expression.
I think you've hit the nail on the head there. There is a risk with this behaviour, but what is the realistic risk level? How much actual danger and harm has there been in reality?

And this has been going on for decades. It is a recognisable part of the sport, iconic. It's an anticipated photo opportunity as cars finish the race.

I guess the real question is, why now? What is happening behind the scenes to cause this decision to be made now?
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

dr-baker wrote: 31 Mar 2023, 05:55
Row Man Gross-Gene wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 18:32
dr-baker wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 17:37 https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-b ... /10450137/

The FIA wants to clamp down on the rule forbidding people from climbing the pitfall, with celebrations at the end of races coming to their minds. Whatever next?

As a general rule, I'm in favor of more safety, I just wonder if this results in more safety. How many people have been hurt climbing up there? In the comments under the story someone commented how tragic it would be for someone to fall into the track and get run over, but I question whether anyone gets up high enough to fall inward. If anyone's been hurt, it's likely that they fell into the pit lane and hurt themselves that way. Which, if it's happening, yeah, I understand the decision, but it also kind of sucks to be taking away some expression.
I think you've hit the nail on the head there. There is a risk with this behaviour, but what is the realistic risk level? How much actual danger and harm has there been in reality?

And this has been going on for decades. It is a recognisable part of the sport, iconic. It's an anticipated photo opportunity as cars finish the race.

I guess the real question is, why now? What is happening behind the scenes to cause this decision to be made now?
As you note, the question is why they want to enforce it now - that particular regulation has been in place since 2006, and yet it was never seen as necessary to enforce.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Rob Dylan
Posts: 3477
Joined: 18 May 2014, 15:34
Location: Andy Warhol's basement

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Rob Dylan »

Yeah, my question might be facetious and missing the whole "risk" point of enforcing it, but has there ever in history been an incident in F1 or a supporting series of a member of team personnel falling onto the track? Ever? I feel like if there had been, it would have been all over the news, remembered forever throughout motorsport as the prime example of why we don't allow it. But it hasn't happened, has it?
Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!
MyHamsterRacedAnOnyx
Posts: 202
Joined: 08 Mar 2011, 01:08

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by MyHamsterRacedAnOnyx »

In reply to Rob's question...
1981 Belgium Grand Prix- an Osella mechanic fell from the wall in the pits and was hit by Reutemann's car.He sadly died of a fractured skull.Then there was the shambles at the start with an Arrows mechanic racing onto the grid to try and restart Patrese's car,only to be hit by Stohr in the other Arrows.
Some people are looking for the meaning of life.Me,I'll be satisfied with a cute girl who can tell her Andrea Moda from her AGS...
User avatar
Row Man Gross-Gene
Posts: 756
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 18:48
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Row Man Gross-Gene »

MyHamsterRacedAnOnyx wrote: 31 Mar 2023, 12:56 In reply to Rob's question...
1981 Belgium Grand Prix- an Osella mechanic fell from the wall in the pits and was hit by Reutemann's car.He sadly died of a fractured skull.
That is tragic, but I wonder if there even was a catch fence in 1981 or just wall at that point that didn't require any real climbing to fall over. The fact that the rule only dates from 2006 indicates to me that the situations are very different. That said, if a bunch of mechanics etc. are breaking ankles falling off the fence, then it needs to be dealt with in some way, but I'd argue a ban isn't the only effective possibility.

As to why now? That's easy, a new person has come in and now wants to stamp their authority on the situation. It happens all the time in every type of organization at every level.

I don't know if I just missed it or if it wasn't in there, but I'm not clear on the punishment for a violation. I could imagine most of the drivers saying to their crews, "be safe, but I want you up there cheering me on if we win, I'll pay the fine". Unless the punishment is disqualification or a $15 million fine.
It's just unbelievable...that Formula 1 could be such a ridiculous melange of idiots.

-Jamie McGregor

Check out my colo(u)ring pages website: http://sites.google.com/site/carcoloringpages/
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

Row Man Gross-Gene wrote: 31 Mar 2023, 15:09
MyHamsterRacedAnOnyx wrote: 31 Mar 2023, 12:56 In reply to Rob's question...
1981 Belgium Grand Prix- an Osella mechanic fell from the wall in the pits and was hit by Reutemann's car.He sadly died of a fractured skull.
That is tragic, but I wonder if there even was a catch fence in 1981 or just wall at that point that didn't require any real climbing to fall over. The fact that the rule only dates from 2006 indicates to me that the situations are very different. That said, if a bunch of mechanics etc. are breaking ankles falling off the fence, then it needs to be dealt with in some way, but I'd argue a ban isn't the only effective possibility.

As to why now? That's easy, a new person has come in and now wants to stamp their authority on the situation. It happens all the time in every type of organization at every level.

I don't know if I just missed it or if it wasn't in there, but I'm not clear on the punishment for a violation. I could imagine most of the drivers saying to their crews, "be safe, but I want you up there cheering me on if we win, I'll pay the fine". Unless the punishment is disqualification or a $15 million fine.
It is true that Giovanni Amadeo fell from the pit wall and was run over by Reutemann, but it should be noted that he didn't fall onto the track. He actually fell off the pit wall and into the pit lane, and the main point of criticism was that the pit lane was heavily overcrowded and far too narrow, which meant Reutemann couldn't avoid him. The fact that there was so little room between the live pit lane, the pit wall and the area where pit stops took place was something the drivers and mechanics had been complaining about at Zolder for several years, and there was a protest by the mechanics and drivers as a result of that accident.

Since you ask though, yes, there was no catch fencing in place between the pit wall and the track - only a simple armco barrier. In fact, calling it a "pit wall" is very generous - the "pit wall" comprised of a narrow ridge of concrete between the pit lane and the armco barrier.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Paul Hayes
Posts: 1101
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 19:54

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Paul Hayes »

A shame Verstappen went and spoiled everyone's fun, but for a while that looked like quite an interesting qualifying session!
User avatar
Vassago
Posts: 163
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 07:44
Location: Poland

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Vassago »

Michael Masi is laughing over those nonsense. Expect a MASSIVE shitstorm after this clown show.
95 GP / 63 DNF / 5 pts
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8091
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by mario »

Vassago wrote: 02 Apr 2023, 07:17 Michael Masi is laughing over those nonsense. Expect a MASSIVE shitstorm after this clown show.
By a peculiar twist, Masi was apparently present in the paddock this weekend as a guest of the FIA.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Paul Hayes
Posts: 1101
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 19:54

Re: 2023 Discussion Thread

Post by Paul Hayes »

Poor old Hulkenberg. Had Verstappen made it into sector two he'd have been on the podium at last!
Post Reply