Page 92 of 118

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 00:07
by go_Rubens
roblomas52 wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:Looks like something you see on the back of a 19 year-old's 1.0 litre Corsa. What a joke.

Has it actually changed the sound?

I think it has.
http://wtf1.co.uk/f1-megaphone-exhaust/


It sounds worse now. That's even at low speed. It sounds too artificial.

When can the FIA get the message to just bathplug off?

When will butthurt F1 fans stop bitching?

Or, more relevant of a rant regarding today's Formula 1:

Why can't Jean Todt keep stopping cost cap plans when they're obviously in much need? Obviously his work at Ferrari has deluded him a lot. So much for that...

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 06:35
by Salamander
go_Rubens wrote:Why can't Jean Todt keep stopping cost cap plans when they're obviously in much need? Obviously his work at Ferrari has deluded him a lot. So much for that...


It's not Jean Todt that's blocking them, it's the Strategy Group (McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull, Lotus, Williams, and Mercedes) and Bernie that are stopping the cost cut plans.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 07:26
by CoopsII
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/27418196
According to Rosberg the trumpet exhaust has failed so....

...expect it to be mandatory for all teams from Canada onwards :lol:

This could be the beginning of Stupid-Trumpet-Exhausts-To-Appease-Stupid-People-Gate...

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 09:28
by MorbidelliObese
CoopsII wrote:Whats next? Chaining the cars together to appease the [self-edited] who complain about the cars not racing wheel to wheel for 78 laps?


Be careful - this is an open forum and we wouldn't want to give the strategy group or whatever they call themselves any ideas...

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 10:21
by DanielPT
CoopsII wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/27418196
According to Rosberg the trumpet exhaust has failed so....

...expect it to be mandatory for all teams from Canada onwards :lol:

This could be the beginning of Stupid-Trumpet-Exhausts-To-Appease-Stupid-People-Gate...


I am pretty sure that those people who complain do drill a small hole in their exhaust black-box.

Exibit 1: Cars exhaust that will make my car sound like a formula one car?

Exibit 2: http://www.ask.com/question/how-can-i-make-my-car-louder-for-free

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 10:27
by CoopsII
Cavallino Silver wrote
Get some speakers and download some recorded F1 sounds. Shouldnt be too difficult.


Ive submitted the above to the FIA technical delegate and Im optimistic of a reply very soon.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 10:52
by DanielPT
CoopsII wrote:
Cavallino Silver wrote
Get some speakers and download some recorded F1 sounds. Shouldnt be too difficult.


Ive submitted the above to the FIA technical delegate and Im optimistic of a reply very soon.


Should be promising.

An example from Sniff Petrol:

Image

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 11:11
by CoopsII
Nico Tweeted this himself...

Image

What a wonderful exhaust.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 11:50
by Collieafc
CoopsII wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/27418196
According to Rosberg the trumpet exhaust has failed so....

...expect it to be mandatory for all teams from Canada onwards :lol:

This could be the beginning of Stupid-Trumpet-Exhausts-To-Appease-Stupid-People-Gate...


At least Merc were trying something out for the good of the fans (whether the fans are right or not is a different matter). Nice to see one team try something that isnt an arodynamic update - trumpets are far more fun!

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 17:00
by takagi_for_the_win
Anyone else think that Mercedes made it as visually unappealing as possible, seeing as they're the ones with most to lose if the regulations were changed?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 20:01
by CoopsII
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Anyone else think that Mercedes made it as visually unappealing as possible, seeing as they're the ones with most to lose if the regulations were changed?

Im not sure if you could make any attachment with that specific job to do look any different. As a concept the whole thing sounds like a late April Fools joke. At our expense. Again.

It is, however, incredibly Rejectful and part of me hopes they do make it part of the regulations only bigger. And they can name it the Make-Dur-Brum-Brum-Go-Louder-Thingy.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 20:55
by Jocke1
AustralianStig wrote:Image
Why stop at a trumpet!? Let's not forget other wind instruments like saxophones, tubas and trombones!


This could be one solution:
Image

I can totally picture these guys sitting on the FW36. I'd love to see a PS of it.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 15 May 2014, 21:53
by WeirdKerr
cherry bomb exhaust.... ?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 16 May 2014, 09:01
by GerhardTalger
I would opt for Vuvuzelas

Anyway, I think it's truly idiotic to delete some memorial corner names at the A1 Ring... and give them bathplug sponsorship names. Especially because the Gerhard Berger kurve is now history. :(

But Bernie will like this.. history going down the drain and such.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 16 May 2014, 09:55
by girry
T1 at Indy could do with a name...."Michelin"?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 16 May 2014, 12:35
by watka
giraurd wrote:T1 at Indy could do with a name...."Michelin"?


I'd prefer "Tiago's Turn"

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 16 May 2014, 13:50
by Klon
watka wrote:
giraurd wrote:T1 at Indy could do with a name...."Michelin"?


I'd prefer "Tiago's Turn"


Nah, it's gotta be the "Karthikeyankurve". :P

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 16 May 2014, 21:50
by roblo97
Klon wrote:
watka wrote:
giraurd wrote:T1 at Indy could do with a name...."Michelin"?


I'd prefer "Tiago's Turn"


Nah, it's gotta be the "Karthikeyankurve". :P

How about "Friesacher's Front Turn"?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 17 May 2014, 13:00
by FullMetalJack
roblomas52 wrote:
Klon wrote:
watka wrote:
I'd prefer "Tiago's Turn"


Nah, it's gotta be the "Karthikeyankurve". :P

How about "Friesacher's Front Turn"?


Friesacurve

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 17 May 2014, 16:43
by Pointrox
giraurd wrote:T1 at Indy could do with a name...."Michelin"?

TWNSNBM!

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 21 May 2014, 00:13
by watka
Pointrox wrote:
giraurd wrote:T1 at Indy could do with a name...."Michelin"?

TWNSNBM!


We have a winner!

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 24 May 2014, 22:10
by Nessafox
*must resist ranting about the elections*

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 25 May 2014, 00:24
by Aerospeed
Why must everyone compare Rosberg/Hamilton to Prost/Senna? Let them write their own history... :?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 25 May 2014, 01:29
by Frentzen127
Aerospeed wrote:Why must everyone compare Rosberg/Hamilton to Prost/Senna? Let them write their own history... :?


Tell that to Hamilton.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 25 May 2014, 04:22
by Jocke1
Why must everyone compare Chilton/Ericsson to Fangio/Moss? Let them write their own history, damn it. :x

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 22:15
by UncreativeUsername37
The Hockenheimring has this picture on their homepage. What year do they think it is? 1999?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 23:03
by Klon
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:The Hockenheimring has this picture on their homepage. What year do they think it is? 1999?


You are aware that Black, Red and Gold are the colours of the German flag?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 00:59
by Boomstick
Why is it that every time I see someone whining about the current state of F1 its usually an American?

This is not intended as a direct shot at our American friends, I'm just wondering if its tied into the rise and fall of Indycar, and the fact that you did for a while have a viable alternate so you don't look at F1 through the same lense as some of us do?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 01:43
by UncreativeUsername37
Klon wrote:
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:The Hockenheimring has this picture on their homepage. What year do they think it is? 1999?


You are aware that Black, Red and Gold are the colours of the German flag?

Yes, I am. I didn't realise that's what they were going for.

:oops: for me.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 07:12
by CoopsII
Boomstick wrote:Why is it that every time I see someone whining about the current state of F1 its usually an American?

Why is it whenever I read a daft comment on here it's usually based on nothing but conjecture?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 08:02
by AustralianStig
Boomstick wrote:Why is it that every time I see someone whining about the current state of F1 its usually an American?

Every time usually?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 08:48
by Shizuka
This wrote:*must resist ranting about the elections*


I seriously hope UKIP won't get a bigger foothold. :roll: (Sorry Ataxia :oops: )
I am planning to move to the UK, and if they block off migrants from the EU (you can't even say I have language issues; I got a C TELC certificate 9 years ago and I have a BA degree as well), I'd be royally screwed.

Different topic, because I don't want to rant about it much myself either...
Why do I have a feeling that we will lose two teams at the end of 2014, with Bernie going to say stupid things after their fold? (Sauber and Caterham)

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 09:44
by Ataxia
Shizuka wrote:
This wrote:*must resist ranting about the elections*


I seriously hope UKIP won't get a bigger foothold. :roll: (Sorry Ataxia :oops: )


Woah, what? Since when did I ever support UKIP?

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 15:52
by Shizuka
Ataxia wrote:Woah, what? Since when did I ever support UKIP?


I just mentioned you because of the :roll: smiley. ;) I should have stated that in the first place. :oops:

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 16:08
by Ataxia
Shizuka wrote:
Ataxia wrote:Woah, what? Since when did I ever support UKIP?


I just mentioned you because of the :roll: smiley. ;) I should have stated that in the first place. :oops:


Oh right, I see...I was all ready to get offended haha!

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 16:28
by CoopsII
Shizuka wrote:Why do I have a feeling that we will lose two teams at the end of 2014, with Bernie going to say stupid things after their fold? (Sauber and Caterham)

I think Lotus could be on that list too.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 04 Jun 2014, 06:49
by Shizuka
You're right - maybe 7th (at best; the Mercedes trio of SFI-McLaren-Williams are way too ahead now) won't help their financial status, and even for that place they have to fight with STR...

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 04 Jun 2014, 07:02
by CoopsII
Shizuka wrote:You're right - maybe 7th (at best; the Mercedes trio of SFI-McLaren-Williams are way too ahead now) won't help their financial status, and even for that place they have to fight with STR...

I think that even if they grab a few points the team seems unstable to the point of disintegrating anyway.

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 04 Jun 2014, 08:43
by Shizuka
True. This will throw up some moves in the drivers market - Grosjean is plonking that car where it doesn't belong, and even before this, he outdrove the E22. This simply can't be overlooked by other teams. I'm not sure if we see 22 cars on the grid next year. :( Even if Kolles comes back and Haas somehow gets a 2015 entry together, there's the chance of losing three teams, including two oldtimers... (because despite the ownership changes in both Sauber and Enstone, they both have been on the grid for at least 2 decades...)

Re: Rantbox

Posted: 04 Jun 2014, 09:11
by CoopsII
Personally I wont be sad to see the back of Maldonado if Lotus does go belly up. He just appears shockingly bad, and not in a good Rejectful way either. Its frustrating as that win in Spain, despite being obviously a fluke, still required some semblance of ability to acheive. Ability that now seems to have evaporated.

Grosjean however is a shoe-in to replace Raikkonen at Ferrari next year.

In my world anyway :D