Peter wrote:I just don't want to see DRS overpowered again. I hated to see Alonso go through all that work and ingeniousness in Canada to jump Vettel and Hamilton, only to have Lewis sail past again like it was nothing.
To be fair, by that point in the race Lewis's pace advantage, at more than a second a lap and growing, was enough to have seen him comfortably past both drivers fairly soon - as it was, Alonso's tyre wear was so severe that Hamilton was already past Alonso before they even reached the DRS activation point, because his superior traction meant that he could simply out accelerate Alonso. Speaking of Canada, they had already tried cutting down the size of the DRS zone in Canada compared to last year for that reason, although the FIA does face something of a difficult balancing act given that they still have relatively little data to work from.
I probably should have been more clear. I meant after Alonso made his first pitstop. He leapfrogged Lewis and Vettel, and his lead only existed from pit exit to the DRS zone.
I see, although Alonso's problems in that race were compounded by a relatively long warm up period for the tyres, which hindered Vettel quite noticeably too (with Hamilton passing Vettel by staying out for longer, something that is unusual this season).
Back to this weekend, we now have three drivers having to make a premature gearbox change and picking up penalties - Red Bull noticed some abnormal data signals from the hydraulics operating the gear selection mechanism, and after carrying out an overnight investigation they found that it was a terminal issue, necessitating a gearbox change. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/101341
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning: "The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
Screw Glock, De La Rosa's up to P6. And 19 people have set a time!
This is HRT's race
HRT 1-2; de la Rosa leads Kathikeyan home by half a minute after 15 people crash out in torrential rain, with Grosjean salvaging a 3rd after having his front wing replaced 2 times. You heard it here first
Wizzie wrote: Screw Glock, De La Rosa's up to P6. And 19 people have set a time!
This is HRT's race
HRT 1-2; de la Rosa leads Kathikeyan home by half a minute after 15 people crash out in torrential rain, with Grosjean salvaging a 3rd after having his front wing replaced 2 times. You heard it here first
That could have been post of the year until I read the second part
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
AdrianSutil wrote:Grosjean, Webber and.. Rosberg(?) all have 5-place drops now. The rule needs to be scrapped, it's just stupid.
This, so so much. It's just ridiculously unfair. They've done nothing wrong, so why should they be punished?
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
AdrianSutil wrote:Grosjean, Webber and.. Rosberg(?) all have 5-place drops now. The rule needs to be scrapped, it's just stupid.
This, so so much. It's just ridiculously unfair. They've done nothing wrong, so why should they be punished?
I can understand grid drops from causing a crash or ignoring yellow flags (read: Japan 2009 quali, where no less than 5 drivers got grid drops after a Toro Rosso crashed), but a faulty gearbox?! Come on, how can a driver prevent that?
RIP NAN - 26/12/2014 RIP DAD - 9/2/2015
Currently building a Subaru Impreza to compete in the 2016 MSV Trophy. PremierInn spokesperson for Great Ormond Street Hospital
AdrianSutil wrote:Grosjean, Webber and.. Rosberg(?) all have 5-place drops now. The rule needs to be scrapped, it's just stupid.
This, so so much. It's just ridiculously unfair. They've done nothing wrong, so why should they be punished?
I can understand grid drops from causing a crash or ignoring yellow flags (read: Japan 2009 quali, where no less than 5 drivers got grid drops after a Toro Rosso crashed), but a faulty gearbox?! Come on, how can a driver prevent that?
Johnny Herbert did mention during FP3 that if a driver drives too aggressively, especially through too much kerb-hopping, it can damage the gearbox. That being said, the grid penalties are too harsh.
Then again, at least it's not as bad as pretty much anything in the IndyCar rulebook
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
East Londoner wrote:This, so so much. It's just ridiculously unfair. They've done nothing wrong, so why should they be punished?
I can understand grid drops from causing a crash or ignoring yellow flags (read: Japan 2009 quali, where no less than 5 drivers got grid drops after a Toro Rosso crashed), but a faulty gearbox?! Come on, how can a driver prevent that?
Johnny Herbert did mention during FP3 that if a driver drives too aggressively, especially through too much kerb-hopping, it can damage the gearbox. That being said, the grid penalties are too harsh.
Then again, at least it's not as bad as pretty much anything in the IndyCar rulebook
Defend your lead = Disqualified Wet tyres = Not traditional, so we won't bother
Least it's not CRAPCAR with fans that are only interested in crashes, causing forced caution periods. Oh, and a million points for the winner. And a 100 for the guy who came last
AdrianSutil wrote:I can understand grid drops from causing a crash or ignoring yellow flags (read: Japan 2009 quali, where no less than 5 drivers got grid drops after a Toro Rosso crashed), but a faulty gearbox?! Come on, how can a driver prevent that?
Johnny Herbert did mention during FP3 that if a driver drives too aggressively, especially through too much kerb-hopping, it can damage the gearbox. That being said, the grid penalties are too harsh.
Then again, at least it's not as bad as pretty much anything in the IndyCar rulebook
Defend your lead = Disqualified Wet tyres = Not traditional, so we won't bother
Least it's not CRAPCAR with fans that are only interested in crashes, causing forced caution periods. Oh, and a million points for the winner. And a 100 for the guy who came last
Last time I checked NASCAR now only awards 43 points for a win.
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
AdrianSutil wrote:[quote="East I can understand grid drops from causing a crash or ignoring yellow flags (read: Japan 2009 quali, where no less than 5 drivers got grid drops after a Toro Rosso crashed), but a faulty gearbox?! Come on, how can a driver prevent that?
Johnny Herbert did mention during FP3 that if a driver drives too aggressively, especially through too much kerb-hopping, it can damage the gearbox. That being said, the grid penalties are too harsh.
Then again, at least it's not as bad as pretty much anything in the IndyCar rulebook
Defend your lead = Disqualified Wet tyres = Not traditional, so we won't bother
Don't forget the 10 place grid penalties for every time an Engine Manufacturer bathplugs it up
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
The cars seem very nervous and twitchy at the moment. I suppose a consequence of the practice sessions being affected by rain.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
McLaren believe they are safe in Q1, then Hulkenberg puts in a 1:16.2 on softs.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
Schumi under pressure as well. Only just scrapes into Q2.
Mr Vergne is in the out yet again.
Last edited by Londoner on 21 Jul 2012, 12:21, edited 1 time in total.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
It's raining! Bunsen and The Reverend are on inters.
Inters are the wrong tyres judging by how Bunsen is struggling for grip. Full wets are needed.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
I wonder who's gonna smack it into the barriers first. They're all over the shop!
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
Rosberg a whopping 3.5 seconds behind Schumacher. If he didn't set his car up for wet conditions, I can somewhat understand a difference, but not this much - so this is a big FAIL.
Nico Hulkenberg attempting to shorten the Hockenheim circuit even further.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l