Enforcer wrote:Well... that happened.
I just hope he doesn't look at F1 in a couple of years and think: "Damn, I wish I was still doing that."
With rule changes that might potentially shake up the grid next season I think Mercedes will want to have a clear #1, so I don't see them going for Alonso. Wehrlein's Christmas has come early.
Ricciardo has more or less asked the same question - when asked, he said that he wouldn't be satisfied with just achieving one title and wondered whether Rosberg might be left with the feeling that he could, and perhaps should, have achieved more.
To be honest, the sheer abruptness of his decision is such that I'm still confused as to what to make of it. I can only assume that he must have been planning this in advance - however, if it is true that he made the decision only a few hours after winning the title (he claims he made the decision the day after the race), it feels so quick as to almost feel a little rash.
Equally, whilst some have wondered if this had anything to do with his clashes with Hamilton, Rosberg has also said that he would have kept going if he had come second, so evidently he wasn't that deterred - let's not forget, only four months earlier he happily signed a two year contract extension and, given how closely both his career and that of Hamilton's have been intertwined, it isn't as if he didn't already know what he was like.
Perhaps it is not that he was worried about, but rather the fact that winning the title would have come with expectations to do more to publicise the sport and to undertake more advertising work for his team, something that Rosberg traditionally has been rather loath to do. In some senses, he is a bit like Kimi - tending to be more reluctant to put himself into the spotlight in that way - and perhaps he felt that the flip side of being a champion wasn't of interest to him.