Rosset to race '96 Arrows

The place for respectful and reverent discussion of Reject drivers and teams, whether profiled or not as yet
Post Reply
Chilled Phill
Posts: 64
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 21:50
Location: Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Chilled Phill »

Anybody familiar with the EUROBoss series maybe interested to know that Ricardo Rosset will race in an Arrows F17, used during the 1996 season, in the series this year. :D The car, bought from an Norwegian owner, will be prepared by the team which oversaw the Brazilian's only win in British F3: Fortec Motorsport.

Nice to see a former reject being reunited with a machine which helped him on his way into the F1 Reject site... :lol:
Debaser
Posts: 623
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 19:03
Location: Enfield,London

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Debaser »

Wow what a reunion-How romantic. Reject drive meeting his maker...what a great prospect.
Pedro_Diniz
Posts: 103
Joined: 08 Apr 2009, 19:33
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Pedro_Diniz »

Poor Ricardo. I'm not doubting his Rejectdom but he wasn't blessed with much hope when you look at the teams and cars that he drove for!
Kimi: "I was having a sheeet."
User avatar
runningboots
Posts: 62
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 11:13

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by runningboots »

Wouldn't it be funny if they raced at a track used in 1996, and he got a faster lap with the same car, but using the generic-spec Avon tyres they use for this sort of series. It would also be good if they could find another car for Taki Inoe[sp] and Jos the Boss
RejectSteve
Posts: 891
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 22:32
Location: Aquashicola, Pennsylvania, USA
Contact:

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by RejectSteve »

runningboots wrote:Wouldn't it be funny if they raced at a track used in 1996, and he got a faster lap with the same car, but using the generic-spec Avon tyres they use for this sort of series. It would also be good if they could find another car for Taki Inoe[sp] and Jos the Boss

What we need is a Lola T97/30 for Vincenzo Sospiri and a Larousse LH94 for our man JDD, and we're all set for a season of fun. Which combination would be slower?

What ever happened to those Lolas? I presume they were sold when Lola went bust but unlike the Forti FG03's, we never heard of them again.
Nissanymania! Friday has never been the same since.

The car in front is a Stefan.
User avatar
midgrid
Posts: 705
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 19:27
Location: UK

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by midgrid »

On the subject of Ricardo Rosset, I saw this interesting interview posted in another forum today:

The interview was held in March 2008.

GP: How important was Rubens Barrichello at that point (F-3) of your career?

RR: Well, very important. He is a very technical driver, who I consider to be in a very high level, he knows the drill. We used to discuss setups a lot. He was British F-3 champion and gave me lots of tips. He helped me a lot.

GP: From then on your performance improved…

RR: I was very devoted also. Of course, Rubinho helped me a lot and then, in the process, it became reciprocal. I am pretty technical too. Since I was 8 I used to disassemble carburators. I always liked the mechanics of a car. We always discussed a lot about setups, what to do in the races. When he practiced in a F1, I
used to show up and help him a little. It was very cool, our camaraderie was good.

GP: What were your strong rivals back then?


RR: Of all of them, it was the one who was Rubinho’s teammate in Stewart, Jan Magnussen. There were strong competitors in British F3 back then: him, (Dario) Franchitti, (Pedro) de la Rosa… good drivers came out of there.

GP: You made yourself available for testing for Williams. Tell us more about that…

RR: Back then, there wasn’t this testing culture and that’s what I wanted. I wanted to get into F1 as a test-driver to acquire mileage and experience to be in other team’s main lineup. It occurs that Frank Williams signed (Jean-Cristophe) Boullion because of Renault and ran out of sits. I had to opt between F-Indy and F1 and I chose the latter.

GP: You did refuse an offer to have a F-Indy race-sit, didn't you?

RR: I tested for Walker. It was a good drive, I was quick at Homestead test, but in the road circuit, besides testing for F1. It was a milestone in my career. I knew that, if I went to F-Indy, first it wasn’t to my liking and second I’d be too old for F1, since I was relatively old. It was all or nothing. I said: “I can’t be a test-driver, teams are not open, I don’t want to go to F-Indy and if I go, I’m not coming back”, so I took what was ahead, and that was Arrows.

GP: Do you consider a mistake to have gone to Arrows instead of Minardi in 1996?

RR: Either were very weak, with financial difficulties… It was unfortunate. I came in a time, me and Rubinho, when established drivers didn’t switch teams. There were no vacancies, you had nowhere to go. Nowadays you see renovation with drivers going away and race-sits being available every time. That helps a new driver.

GP: Tell us about your difficulties with Arrows.

RR: Look at my pre-season: I had 30 laps worth of practice in Estoril, Portugal before the season start to learn how the car’s gearbox and mechanisms worked. I went straight to the first race. I mean, today, drivers have 10 thousand km before a race. It’s a different story. The car is very physical, hard to drive. To have 30 laps and finish 8th in Australia was all I could do. Then it started because we didn’t have money. In Monaco, it started to rain 15 minutes before the race and we hadn’t practiced in the wet.

They gave everyone 15 minutes to practice and when I was getting ready to go in, the crew told me: “ You can’t drive.” And I was “But how? Isn’t it going to be a wet race?” I asked. They answered: “We have only one front wing. If you crash, you don’t start”. I mean, a circuit like Monaco where I never drove in the wet, I would have to drive clueless. “That’s all we can do”, they said. So it was like this. This world no one sees. It was very difficult indeed. I thought it was very strange, because the scenario was worse than many F-3 and F-3000 teams. It was very bad.

GP: In 1997 it was worse, since you went to just one race and didn’t even do one start with Lola…

RR: That was sheer insanity from those involved. We came in a bit fooled by a dream that had a huge sponsor (Mastercard), a big structure. But there came the first race and the car wouldn’t switch gears. It’s not that it didn’t qualify for the race, it just really didn’t switch gears. You hit it and it didn’t change, didn’t go up or down. The car didn’t work in the first race. We went there simply for the record. Of course, the car didn’t qualify, we arrived in Brazil and the sponsor broke the contract. It was madness, an irresponsibility from all those involved.

GP: Was it painful to see the year through without a drive?

RR: It was very bad, because I was just starting in F1. It was hard to cope because you devote an entire life to get there, you give everything, face challenges… I was lost. I thought my career was over until Tyrrell came about.

GP: By the way, you managed a kind of “dribble” to stick yourself to Tyrrell signing with their new owner, Reynard. That generated some heat, innit? Since they had signed Norberto Fontana…

RR: It was a fight, that. I had all support from Reynard, whom I knew in England and I believed in my potential. Tyrrell had another option, but since Reynard had just bought the team, they opted for me and they started to boycott me and there were financial interests one over the other. It was a complete mess. It was also a tough year. I came to know afterwards that a great scheme was being plotted behind the Japanese, (Tora) Takagi, to convince everyone he was the man and that was the team to form Honda, what happened years later. With all that, I wasn’t qualifying to races and it was hard.

GP: Were the results really “fabricated”?


RR: Basically. They forced all the car development onto Takagi’s and I had to fight with an undriveable thing. When I started to drive ahead of others, the car didn’t deliver. It was a cheat.

GP: And what kind of cheat did they do to you?


RR: Ah, all kinds. It’s so easy to sabotage. They would drop three pounds off the tire’s pressure before qualifying. That happened a lot: I would measure my tire’s pressure and they were off. Then you found just about everything: the bar was wrong, the wing was wrong, all “coincidentally”. It’s too easy to take 3 to 4 tenths off a car.

GP: You would sometimes race with Takagi’s used equipment, right?

RR: It was a… Look, everything they could do to xxxxx me off, they did. Then, by the middle of the season, everything came clear. The Honda team was on the makes, but it was an internal fight between Tyrrell crew and Takagi to take Honda and, on the other side, Reynard to take Honda. Since I was a Reynard driver, they (Tyrrell) wanted to show their driver was better, stronger. Then, in the end, it was what it was.

GP: And how was it to deal with all that?

RR: Difficult, yeah? It was one of the reasons that made me not even try anymore after 1998, because you devote yourself, put your life at stake, and that was the year I risked myself the most, because I wouldn’t admit to trail the peck and would put the car on the edge, risking to crash. I would crash eventually.

But when the year came to an end, I sat down and thought: “Either I manage to be in a good environment, with an average team, or big, that provide me with the means to drive competitively, or I risk my life here. I will take a new path, because this ain’t taking me nowhere.” Then I decided to go back home, live my life and run my business and that was it.

GP: Your despair behind the wheel was clear in Monaco. From then on, a lot of people started to make fun of you. How was it to face all that?


RR: I never cared much to what the press says. I didn’t worry because no one could evaluate what was happening. In Monaco, people would make fun of me questioning how could I do that. Well, the car’s clutch didn’t work. The reverse didn’t work. Only the driver in the cockpit knows. And I also feel that for Rubinho when they made fun of him. Only the driver in the car knows what’s happening. People can say whatever they want, make fun, it doesn’t matter to me.

I knew what I was doing, the difficulties I was going through and I had nothing to do. How could you make the car move if it spins on the axis but the gear wouldn’t change? Who’s in there knows what’s going on. I had my family’s support, they loved me, I never lost my confidence I’d be a quick driver and I liked to drive. So, actually, I’m very comfortable about this, I never had any problems.

GP: Michael Schumacher came to your support back then, is it true?

RR: Yes, a lot. By the way, he’s a guy who always surprised me. There are people who surprise you and people who let you down. Schumacher, (Jean) Alesi, always when we met, they talked to me. Schumacher once gave me a ride to the Japan GP. I remember to this day. I was going away walking from the track to the hotel. The team didn’t have anything more and left me on the track and I was walking with my stuff. Then Schumacher and his manager stopped by and said: “Come on in, I’ll give you ride.”

When we were already in the car he asked: “What’s going on? Why are you walking?”. I answered: “Look, it’s a long story It’s a different world to that you are living in. It’s another world, a dirty one.” He went on: “You can’t stop, you can’t give up”. I said: “I wouldn’t like to, but it’s very hard, it’s hard to find a team who supports you.” He was always very helpful. They knew what was going on.

And there are jerks like (Jacques) Villeneuve who talk a lot of bullxxxx. The problem is the press sometimes listens. It’s hard because the press sometimes writes what it sees and doesn’t have any knowledge of what’s behind that. Monaco was an example of that.

GP: You described the people who surprised you. Who let you down?

RR: Several people. F1 circus as a whole was frustrating. It’s not pure sport. There are lots of interests. That’s very bad. Some drivers, like Villeneuve, don’t deserve an ounce of respect. He’s a very low, bad person. And he ended up like that. He was a champion by chance, because he had a good car. It’s even bad because of who he is son of (Gilles), a fantastic guy whose son thought too much of himself and even thought he was better than his father. Just an ugly guy.

GP: Not to mention 1998, when you had bad shunts, like Germany, Hungary and Belgium. Was Hockenheim the worst of them all?

RR: Yes, it was. It’s that problem of living on the edge. I ended up crashing, not much to do. On turn 1, before the old straight, I entered in the car’s maximum limit; it went over the kerbs and passed. When it passed, it whipped off and hit the wall very hard. They (paramedics) wouldn’t even let me race because my helmet was cracked. I came out walking, but the impact in my head reached 40G. That was my worst crash.

GP: Tell us how was that accident in Spa seen from your cockpit. What was the sight you had of that mega pile-up?


RR: I hadn’t any! All drivers were against that start. A lot was said on the grid, they called everyone to see if the start would be made under safety car. There was a lot of water on the track. It wasn’t only a matter of visibility, but also of aquaplaning. But they decided to start that way. Soon after the start, people even slowed down on the first corner. When I hit the gas, a huge water spray was raised and I couldn’t see anything. I was guiding myself using the side guard-rail. It was a huge spray.

Suddenly, I saw a wheel flying from inside the spray and hitting the fence. It was like fog on a mountain. I saw the wheel flying and lifted my foot. When I started seeing again, everyone was crashed. All I could do was hit the brakes, but aquaplaning, the car didn’t slow down and I saw Trulli crossing the track. Then I thought: “My goodness, I’ll kill the guy”, because I would hit his side. I was worried about him. I hit him right in the middle, but I didn’t have much to do. The car was blocked. Then I hit him, pushed him and the car stopped.

I hit the seatbelt, jumped out of the car and saw Rubinho, who stopped right by my side, coming out of the car with several red stains on his suit. He was screaming saying it was hurting, passed his hand and thought it was blood. But I saw it and said: “Calm down, it’s not blood”! It was oil from the rear wheel which sprayed and hit him. So much it must have hurt. “Stay calm because you’re not hurt”. Then I helped him and took him to the medical center. Thank God nothing happened. Those seconds were creepy.

GP: We know that in F1 several drivers pay to race. How much did these years took away from your pocket?

RR: From my pocket, nothing. It’s not that I had to pay. Any driver needed to help completing the teams’ budgets and some didn’t have the cash needed. Verstappen, Takagi… all of them needed to help, complement, bring in their sponsorship shares. Thank God I always had the support of my sponsors, who helped me to complete this share. So, from my pocket I never had to spend any money, it wasn’t possible anyway because of the general level.

GP: So, the decision to quit F1 was yours?

RR: It was mine. As a consequence of other decisions. There was this episode which disappointed me a lot and was very serious, made me thought if it was worth it. It happened with Arrows after the Belgium GP, where Verstappen crashed very hard because of the car losing direction and hitting the wall. We found out the wheels axis was broken. I didn’t know why, nor they did, and we went testing in Silverstone. Since he was recovering, I took his place.

In a sequences of high speed ‘S’s, my axis got broken. It was exactly the same thing. I went back to the workshop and questioned the mechanics what the problem was. Thank God there were mechanics supporting me and they said: “Look, no one knows. It’s breaking the axis”. I asked what would we do and they said: “Not much to do. The axis started to break and maybe we will have to deploy a steel axis. We don’t know if there’s enough time, because we’re on our way to Monza”. That surprised me: “You gotta be kidding. Two axis broken, you have no idea what it is and you’re going to Monza? What are you gonna do?” They said: “Not much to do.”

Back then, Tom Walkinshaw and others called me to talk and I said: “I’m not going to race. If you don’t discover why the axis are breaking, I’m not racing. I know you don’t know”. They tried to fool me: “No, we know, we tried to fix it…”. I went: “No, you don’t know. I got info from inside. I’m not telling who, but I know you haven’t got a clue of what’s going on”. Then, they pressured me. “If you don’t race, we’re bringing another driver to replace you”. I said: “Ok, you can put another driver, but I’ll report to FIA because if he dies, I know I did warn you that it would happen, because he is going to die. If he loses the axis at the end of Monza’s straight, he is going to die. And you don’t give a damn about his life”. And they came with the following answer: “If you are afraid to die, you shouldn’t even be in F1 to begin with”.

The funny thing is that it was the same personnel involved with Williams when Ayrton (Senna) died. I said: “You committed a mistake once, already killed a driver. Does it need a genius to know that a failure can kill a driver?”. That was two years later. And I went: “I’m not risking my neck. If you find out what it is, I race. If not, I’m not racing and I’ll report to FIA. You can say whataver you like, but I’ll go to Bernie (Ecclestone) and I’ll tell him what’s going on, because people will die”. They got kinda desperate. That was the level of disappointment. They didn’t give a xxxx about life, didn’t care. Go there and race. If you die, you died.

Then I went to Verstappen and said: “They didn’t find out and we’re heading to Monza”. Well, in the end, 3 or 4 days before the race, they found out it was a lot of wheels which wouldn’t fit the axis. As it was, the nuts were loosened and created a gap between the wheel and the axis, breaking it. But that was only discovered because I wanted to boycott the race. The level of irresponsibility that went through F1 back then, right after Ayrton’s crash, with the same people, it made you wonder if they were crazy. But they didn’t care. If you died, it was your problem. Then it started ringing in my head: “Either I race properly or don’t at all.”

GP: Do you consider F1 was unfair to you?

RR: I don’t. I just didn’t have the opportunity, actually. I didn’t have the chance in the right moment, at the right time. Prejudiced are those who don’t have any opportunity at all. I had and raced. A lot of good drivers didn’t make it… I did. It wasn’t the best thing ever, but whatever. Life doesn’t end there.

GP: Who is your idol?

RR: Ah, Ayrton, absolutely. I think Ayrton, not only as a driver, sharp, outstanding, but as a person. I always admired what he said, the way he lived his life, the focus he gave on the things he did. I was inspired by him because of his fairness. Not only the driver, but the person.

GP: Do you see any future for Brazilians in F1, excluding Barrichello-Massa-Piquet?

RR: There always will be surprising drivers. I think they just didn’t show up yet. Massa came recently and has a great career ahead. He’s a great driver. I don’t know for how many more years Rubinho will race. If you let him, he’ll race forever and he can do that. About Piquet, to me, he’s future is unknown. He’s very young. He has a great support, his father can help him and he has a great future ahead. The ones who are behind need that. But I don’t follow much.

GP: If you could go back in time and change anything, what would you change?


RR: I think I did everything the way it could be done. I wouldn’t try to change it in any way. I think that I always faced crossings in which I needed to turn left or right and I think I turned the right away for each moment. Not always the options were good and I always tried to take the best one. I don’t regret anything I’ve done. If I could, I’d have started at the age of eight. Then the story could be different. But I believe in faith. Maybe it happened the way it was meant to be.


Full interview
: http://esporte.ig.com.br/grandepremio/grandesentrevistas/2008/03/12/ricardo_rosset_4715460.html
"One day Bruno told me that he had heard the engine momentarily making a strange sound; his suspicion was that all the cylinders had been operating."
--Nigel Roebuck
User avatar
Henrique
Posts: 669
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:48
Location: Portugal

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Henrique »

Thank you very much for sharing that, Midgrid. Great interview. His career looks more sad than funny after reading that :(

And we can add "didn't switch gears" to the list of flaws of the Lola T97 :P
Popi_Larrauri
Posts: 416
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 19:53
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Popi_Larrauri »

Great data!
Winners have lots of friends, losers have good friends.
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by eytl »

Now I must say that is tremendously interesting. A lot of behind-the-scenes info that you just don't know by looking from the outside. If we had time to edit profiles, including Rosset's, we'd be including some of those anecdotes.

However, while I have no reason to dispute that what Ricardo says arose from factual circumstances, there's a feeling of "every F1 team I drove for screwed me around", and I can't help but think that there might be two sides to every story.

Like, I've always been mildly fascinated by what was going on at Tyrrell from 1992-98 when the team started going into terminal decline, but this story of power plays during 1998 with the team going out of its way to favour Takagi ... I wish we could hear different angles on this.

As a side point, I wonder how many people who worked for Tyrrell in 1998 now work for Brawn???
Faustus
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 2073
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 20:23
Location: UK

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Faustus »

eytl wrote:Now I must say that is tremendously interesting. A lot of behind-the-scenes info that you just don't know by looking from the outside. If we had time to edit profiles, including Rosset's, we'd be including some of those anecdotes.

However, while I have no reason to dispute that what Ricardo says arose from factual circumstances, there's a feeling of "every F1 team I drove for screwed me around", and I can't help but think that there might be two sides to every story.

Like, I've always been mildly fascinated by what was going on at Tyrrell from 1992-98 when the team started going into terminal decline, but this story of power plays during 1998 with the team going out of its way to favour Takagi ... I wish we could hear different angles on this.

As a side point, I wonder how many people who worked for Tyrrell in 1998 now work for Brawn???


Not many. A lot of people went to Harvey Postlewaithe's Honda team and then found themselves work with other teams. There was a lot of resentment at the way BAR treated Tyrrell in 1998, so most people were not interested in staying on.
Following Formula 1 since 1984.
Avid collector of Formula 1 season guides and reviews.
Collector of reject merchandise and 1/43rd scale reject model cars.
User avatar
Barbazza
Posts: 1636
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 19:30

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Barbazza »

Whatever Rosset's opinions on how he was treated by the teams he drove for, I totally believe him when he says Villeneuve was an utter knob.
Especially after his 'I'm so desperate to get into F1 now the cars aren't boring to drive any more' interview with Martin Brundle on the grid today. **** off Jacques, we don't want you back!!
Irisado
Posts: 165
Joined: 09 May 2009, 15:54
Location: Nottingham & Hertfordshire, UK

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Irisado »

A very interesting interview, and while some of it certainly doesn't surprise me, especially regarding Lola, there are some comments which seem a little one sided.

The comment about the nose cones at Arrows in 1996 at Monaco overlooks the fact that both Verstappen and Rosset had crashed so many times in free practice that this was why the team had run out of spare parts come Sunday morning and the wet acclimatisation session.

The axle story is more worrying, if true, but we would have to have that side of the story from any mechanics at Arrows in 1996.

Harvey Postlethwaite did argue that Rosset was given equal treatment back in an interview in 1998/99 I see to recall, so I'm not so sure that we can be certain of Rosset's comments at Tyrrell, although that was a very difficult place to be in 1998, as Ken Tyrrell had resigned because Reynard and Pollock had awarded the second Tyrrell seat to Rosset instead of Verstappen, so the team was definitely pulling in different directions.
My favourite teams: Minardi, Forti, Osella

Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente
User avatar
Waris
Posts: 1781
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:07
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Waris »

Screw Villeneuve, RICARDO ROSSET should come back to F1.

That man has an extremely interesting life story. And he seems very honest, too. That interview, especially the part about 1998, sounds like an exciting story, one I thought existed only in fiction, not in real life. Off-track F1 on the outside is much more boring than on the inside. Someone should dig up more behind-the-scenes stories like this.

Does Rosset have a profile on F1 Rejects? I hope he does, because if he doesn't, he needs one.
MOTOR RACING IS DANGEROUS
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by thehemogoblin »

Waris wrote:Screw Villeneuve, RICARDO ROSSET should come back to F1.

That man has an extremely interesting life story. And he seems very honest, too. That interview, especially the part about 1998, sounds like an exciting story, one I thought existed only in fiction, not in real life. Off-track F1 on the outside is much more boring than on the inside. Someone should dig up more behind-the-scenes stories like this.

Does Rosset have a profile on F1 Rejects? I hope he does, because if he doesn't, he needs one.


He has one of the better profiles, in my opinion.
Debaser
Posts: 623
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 19:03
Location: Enfield,London

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Debaser »

That's one of the most revealing interviews I've ever seen. He would still have been slower than Verstappen and Takagi on raw pace, but I do believe a lot of the stuff there, does make a lot of sense. Also surely Lola are the biggest rejects ever, a car that doesn't change gears...
User avatar
Yannick
Posts: 1448
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:53

Re: Rosset to race '96 Arrows

Post by Yannick »

Thank you for posting this eye-opening interview. Rosset's comments clearly show how seriously the Tyrrell team had been in decay during its final season. With knowledge of that, it is absolutely no surprise that the team's successor, BAR, went absolutely nowhere in its initial season and not far as long as Pollock and Reynard were at the helm, because when you take over a team and can't keep it in unity, it won't work together again well by just sticking another name on top of it - and by hiring a rather full of himself No.1 driver. Ken Tyrrell surely did the right thing when he quit that bad working environment.

The Arrows axis episode is very scary and screams Andrea Moda No. 34 at Eau Rouge 1992. Again, the technical department of a team not caring at all is a sign of bad team leadership.

Yes, the Rosset profile should be enriched with a few quotes from this article, but there is no hurry.
"I don't think we should be used to finance (the manufacturers') R&D because they will produce that engine anyway" said Monisha Kaltenborn.
"You will never see a Mercedes using a Ferrari engine or the other way round."
Post Reply