Page 1 of 2

Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 20:37
by Gerudo Dragon
F1RWRS should have a title sponsor.
GP2 is overused.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 20:59
by Klon
GP2 is used by like two bloody series and it's an extremely justified choice given as editing it requires neither graphical skills nor an M.A..

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 21:02
by Gerudo Dragon
Klon wrote:GP2 is used by like two bloody series and it's an extremely justified choice given as editing it requires neither graphical skills nor an M.A..
F1RWRS
F1RDS
F1RNC
F1RGP2C

;)

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 22:31
by Ataxia
Well, it's the only one I can really use that my laptop doesn't struggle to run. I originally wanted to use GP3, but a) only has 11 teams and b) doesn't run on Win7.

GP4 is a bitch to edit, and I don't have anything like F1C or rFactor. So I think my choice is justified.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 22:37
by DemocalypseNow
If anything needs a title sponsor, then Lavezzi, EnerG and V-Tel are interested :twisted:

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 22:42
by Ataxia
Stramala wrote:If anything needs a title sponsor, then Lavezzi, EnerG and V-Tel are interested :twisted:


Or Post & Go...

Image

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 15 Jun 2013, 23:39
by pasta_maldonado
Ataxia wrote:
Stramala wrote:If anything needs a title sponsor, then Lavezzi, EnerG and V-Tel are interested :twisted:


Or Post & Go...

Image

Anyone up for some slightly suspicious investment solutions?

Image

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 16 Jun 2013, 00:13
by Nessafox
darkapprentice77 wrote:F1RWRS should have a title sponsor.

Uenoclinic? Alan Shoe Trader?

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 16 Jun 2013, 09:22
by DemocalypseNow
This wrote:
darkapprentice77 wrote:F1RWRS should have a title sponsor.

Uenoclinic? Alan Shoe Trader?

I can definitely imagine Uenoclinic being some dodgy Japanese pharmacy company...

Image

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 16 Jun 2013, 17:02
by FMecha
Stramala wrote:
This wrote:
darkapprentice77 wrote:F1RWRS should have a title sponsor.

Uenoclinic? Alan Shoe Trader?

I can definitely imagine Uenoclinic being some dodgy Japanese pharmacy company...

Image


You will not believe this - scroll to, or find, Ueno Clinic. :twisted:

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 16 Jun 2013, 19:56
by DemocalypseNow
FMecha wrote:
Stramala wrote:
This wrote:Uenoclinic? Alan Shoe Trader?

I can definitely imagine Uenoclinic being some dodgy Japanese pharmacy company...

Image


You will not believe this - scroll to, or find, Ueno Clinic. :twisted:

I had originally assumed Uenoclinic was a reference to an F1R spam I'd simply forgotten about (we get so much of it, you know). I didn't realise it was actually real. And I was almost there! I just thought they were selling pills rather than surgery for the item mentioned in the article... :?

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 06:21
by Gerudo Dragon
Akrotiri Bay should host another race.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 11:35
by WaffleCat
darkapprentice77 wrote:Akrotiri Bay should host another race.


Currently,it has a spot on the F1RSTC calendar,but that's about it.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 11:39
by TomWazzleshaw
darkapprentice77 wrote:Akrotiri Bay should host another race.


And subject us to another round torture through sheer boredom and mediocrity? You evil, evil man! :o

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 12:10
by DemocalypseNow
There should be more races at Jacarepaguá.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 12:32
by pasta_maldonado
Stramala wrote:There should be more races at Jacarepaguá.

Well, Interlagos was heading off the rFAF1 calendar anyway, and now you've given me a replacement idea.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 12:46
by DemocalypseNow
pasta_maldonado wrote:
Stramala wrote:There should be more races at Jacarepaguá.

Well, Interlagos was heading off the rFAF1 calendar anyway, and now you've given me a replacement idea.

Unforunately the reason it's somewhat lambasted by a few people here is because of the GP2 track. Pitlane entry is bugged. All the drivers turn into Maldonado whenever they need new tyres. There are usually not enough finishers to even fill the podium. But, I like that sort of chaos myself.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 13:43
by Nuppiz
Stramala wrote:
pasta_maldonado wrote:
Stramala wrote:There should be more races at Jacarepaguá.

Well, Interlagos was heading off the rFAF1 calendar anyway, and now you've given me a replacement idea.

Unforunately the reason it's somewhat lambasted by a few people here is because of the GP2 track. Pitlane entry is bugged. All the drivers turn into Maldonado whenever they need new tyres. There are usually not enough finishers to even fill the podium. But, I like that sort of chaos myself.

LGPS 1991 Brazilian GP at Jacarepagua had four finishers. And in my abandoned F1 career for Sophie Fabron, only two AI drivers finished besides me in a full-length race. So this "feature" is available in F1C as well. :) And we all know how closely rFactor is related to F1C...

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 13:45
by Ataxia
Stramala wrote:
pasta_maldonado wrote:
Stramala wrote:There should be more races at Jacarepaguá.

Well, Interlagos was heading off the rFAF1 calendar anyway, and now you've given me a replacement idea.

Unforunately the reason it's somewhat lambasted by a few people here is because of the GP2 track. Pitlane entry is bugged. All the drivers turn into Maldonado whenever they need new tyres. There are usually not enough finishers to even fill the podium. But, I like that sort of chaos myself.


My aborted '86 season had just 3 finishers, it was mad.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 20:27
by dr-baker
I would love to see the Manx TT circuit (all 37.73 miles of it) used for one of the series that Foxdale/West Cliff compete in...

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 21:46
by dinizintheoven
...which reminds me, I must go for a 37.73 mile drive sometime soon!

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 01 Jul 2013, 23:33
by Salamander
dr-baker wrote:I would love to see the Manx TT circuit (all 37.73 miles of it) used for one of the series that Foxdale/West Cliff compete in...


Oh, I just remembered, there's a version of the Manx TT course available for NR2003...

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 07 Jul 2013, 17:55
by Samster
Salamander wrote:
dr-baker wrote:I would love to see the Manx TT circuit (all 37.73 miles of it) used for one of the series that Foxdale/West Cliff compete in...


Oh, I just remembered, there's a version of the Manx TT course available for NR2003...


It's scaled down to about a third of the size though and my attempt at an A1 Grand Prix there resulted in most of the field progressively wiping themselves out before the end of the first lap. :lol:

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 07 Jul 2013, 18:33
by Nuppiz
Samster wrote:
Salamander wrote:
dr-baker wrote:I would love to see the Manx TT circuit (all 37.73 miles of it) used for one of the series that Foxdale/West Cliff compete in...


Oh, I just remembered, there's a version of the Manx TT course available for NR2003...


It's scaled down to about a third of the size though and my attempt at an A1 Grand Prix there resulted in most of the field progressively wiping themselves out before the end of the first lap. :lol:

It also exist for F1C in scaled-down form - 24.7 kilometres to be precise. I guess simulators (or more appropriately, most PCs) simply can't handle extremely long tracks.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 12 Jul 2013, 20:20
by dr-baker
dr-baker wrote:I would love to see the Manx TT circuit (all 37.73 miles of it) used for one of the series that Foxdale/West Cliff compete in...


Nuppiz wrote:
Samster wrote:
Salamander wrote: Oh, I just remembered, there's a version of the Manx TT course available for NR2003...


It's scaled down to about a third of the size though and my attempt at an A1 Grand Prix there resulted in most of the field progressively wiping themselves out before the end of the first lap. :lol:

It also exist for F1C in scaled-down form - 24.7 kilometres to be precise. I guess simulators (or more appropriately, most PCs) simply can't handle extremely long tracks.

Oh. So that's why. :( :cry:

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 12 Jul 2013, 21:07
by Klon
If you can get me realistic times for a LMP1 and GT300 car I may be able to include it in SARS.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 17 Jul 2013, 02:21
by Cynon
Samster wrote:
Salamander wrote:
dr-baker wrote:I would love to see the Manx TT circuit (all 37.73 miles of it) used for one of the series that Foxdale/West Cliff compete in...


Oh, I just remembered, there's a version of the Manx TT course available for NR2003...


It's scaled down to about a third of the size though and my attempt at an A1 Grand Prix there resulted in most of the field progressively wiping themselves out before the end of the first lap. :lol:


The Nordschleife exists for NR2003 as well as a 50+ mile highway course.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 17 Jul 2013, 20:53
by dr-baker
Cynon wrote:The Nordschleife exists for NR2003 as well as a 50+ mile highway course.

The Nordschliefe is 14 miles. Manx TT is 37 miles. Which admittedly is less than 50+ miles...

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 18 Jul 2013, 01:38
by Klon
F3RWRS should be a series using a single-made chassis and one, maybe two, engines.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 18 Jul 2013, 01:44
by SuperAguri
Maybe a couple of chassis and a couple of engines, maybe famous F3 brands like Ralt, Reynard, Dallara and March with engines by Toyota (TOMS), Honda (Mugen), Opel (Spiess), Mercedes, Fiat and VW.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 23 Jul 2013, 23:12
by Gerudo Dragon
Someone should hire Rick Mears for rFaF1.
I like Audi in rFaF1.
Other than FMV's title win, Prost GP was as boring as Gillet.
1991 was a better Life GP season than 1992.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 24 Jul 2013, 17:39
by Nuppiz
Dark77 wrote:1991 was a better Life GP season than 1992.

I have to agree with this. I'm afraid that all single-make series without any specific goal (as opposed to the RWRS feeder categories, which give experience towards F1RWRS) will reach their peak at some point, after which they start to lose their popularity. Also in LGPS, the upgrade system was rather hastily put together and it has started to show its flaws.

You might've noticed that I'm quite bored with LGPS myself. I'm only going to do the 1993 season because I don't want to leave a year's gap in the canon, and also because AxelP800 has already well planned to start his follow-up series from 1994.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 24 Jul 2013, 17:54
by takagi_for_the_win
Restov have been one of the top 5 teams so far this season in the rFaF1

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 24 Jul 2013, 19:31
by UncreativeUsername37
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Restov have been one of the top 5 teams so far this season in the rFaF1

no bias here

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 24 Jul 2013, 19:50
by takagi_for_the_win
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Restov have been one of the top 5 teams so far this season in the rFaF1

no bias here


None whatsoever :P

Seriously though, for a small team in their first season of F1, running a year old car, snapping at the heels of regular points scorers and not being strangers to the top 15 in qualifying is pretty impressive. If it weren't for our shocking reliability we'd have scored at least 5 points by my reckoning.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 25 Jul 2013, 13:44
by Gerudo Dragon
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Seriously though, for a small team in their first season of F1, running a year old car, snapping at the heels of regular points scorers and not being strangers to the top 15 in qualifying is pretty impressive. If it weren't for our shocking reliability we'd have scored at least 5 points by my reckoning.
All because of future world champion Nicchi :D

Tristan Jung shouldn't have had his rejectlicense taken away.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 25 Jul 2013, 18:46
by tristan1117
Dark77 wrote:Tristan Jung shouldn't have had his rejectlicense taken away.


Seconded. FREE JUNG!

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 04 Aug 2013, 03:25
by go_Rubens
The Rejectrucks race in Adelaide, despite the farcical events, was actually a good race. This is also from a disgruntled team owner :lol:

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 05 Aug 2013, 00:06
by Onxy Wrecked
Stramala wrote:I can definitely imagine Uenoclinic being some dodgy Japanese pharmacy company...

Image

That is because Uenoclinic does some dodgy surgeries of the plastic variety.

Re: Unpopular opinions for virtual series

Posted: 05 Aug 2013, 19:40
by dr-baker
Onxy Wrecked wrote:
Stramala wrote:I can definitely imagine Uenoclinic being some dodgy Japanese pharmacy company...

Image

That is because Uenoclinic does some dodgy surgeries of the plastic variety.

You mean of the cosmetic variety?

Image