Quick question about reject eligibility...

The place for respectful and reverent discussion of Reject drivers and teams, whether profiled or not as yet
Post Reply
User avatar
SennaStraight
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 07:39

Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by SennaStraight »

I know the rules about points needed to avoid rejectdom and I know if someone attempts to qualify for a gp but never starts they are eligible but what about someone who has only been a formal test driver but never pre-qualifed/qualified?
Murray - "First man out is Marques in the Arrows. Of course he's going out early to generate some media interest"
Martin - "I'm sure he would generate some interest if he went out in the Arrows because Marques drives for Minardi"
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by CarlosFerreira »

I don't think it applies. I suppose you can only be a reject if you actually participate in a race weekend.
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by thehemogoblin »

I think those people would qualify as Formula One Prejects.
User avatar
DemocalypseNow
Posts: 13185
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 09:30
Location: Lost, send help
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by DemocalypseNow »

thehemogoblin wrote:I think those people would qualify as Formula One Prejects.


Can we have this implemented, so Chanoch Nissany can finally have a profile? :D
Novitopoli wrote:Everytime someone orders at Pizza Hut, an Italian dies.
Novitopoli wrote:Juve's Triplete: Calciopoli, doping & Mafia connections.

Image Image
User avatar
CasinoSquare
Posts: 59
Joined: 09 Nov 2009, 22:57
Location: NZ

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by CasinoSquare »

Here here, then Enrico Toccacelo can get in too..

which brings us to the next Best Of list, namely who are the most noteworthy Prejects?
EuroBrun at HWNSNBM's home GrandPrix - perhaps his boyhood inspiration?
User avatar
watka
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4097
Joined: 26 Apr 2009, 19:04
Location: Chessington, the former home of Brabham
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by watka »

Would Valentino Rossi count as a preject?
Watka - you know, the swimming horses guy
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by thehemogoblin »

watka wrote:Would Valentino Rossi count as a preject?


Did he ever actually take a Ferrari for a spin?
Phoenix
Posts: 7986
Joined: 21 Apr 2009, 13:58

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by Phoenix »

But Sebastien Loeb could...

Paradoxic..the best rally driver ever having F1 not-even-reject status.
User avatar
watka
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4097
Joined: 26 Apr 2009, 19:04
Location: Chessington, the former home of Brabham
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by watka »

thehemogoblin wrote:
watka wrote:Would Valentino Rossi count as a preject?


Did he ever actually take a Ferrari for a spin?


Yep, had the 46 number and all.
Watka - you know, the swimming horses guy
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by eytl »

CarlosFerreira wrote:I don't think it applies. I suppose you can only be a reject if you actually participate in a race weekend.


Well, not quite ... the criteria we've sort of used is someone who was entered with the intention of participating in the race itself. Which is why e.g. Jorge de Bagration and Ricardo Londono are included even though they never took part in an official practice session, and Masami Kuwashima is included even though he only participated on a Saturday.

But the rash of third drivers in the last decade who took part as testers without there ever being an intention for them to take part in qualifying or the race itself, no, they don't get in.

Although gee it's tempting to broaden the criteria to include Chanoch Nissany.
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: Quick question about reject eligibility...

Post by thehemogoblin »

eytl wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:I don't think it applies. I suppose you can only be a reject if you actually participate in a race weekend.


Well, not quite ... the criteria we've sort of used is someone who was entered with the intention of participating in the race itself. Which is why e.g. Jorge de Bagration and Ricardo Londono are included even though they never took part in an official practice session, and Masami Kuwashima is included even though he only participated on a Saturday.

But the rash of third drivers in the last decade who took part as testers without there ever being an intention for them to take part in qualifying or the race itself, no, they don't get in.

Although gee it's tempting to broaden the criteria to include Chanoch Nissany.


You could say that anyone who test-drove and didn't make a lap faster than the slowest qualifier in any race...
Post Reply