dr-baker wrote:jpm wrote:How about the 1997 Lola?
But that livery is iconic in my opinion!
15 secs off the pace says otherwise
dr-baker wrote:jpm wrote:How about the 1997 Lola?
But that livery is iconic in my opinion!
Mexicola wrote:shinji wrote:Mexicola wrote: I'd rather listen to a dog lick its balls. Each to their own, I guess.
Does listening to a dog licking its balls get you excited?
That's between me and my internet service provider.
roblomas52 wrote:dr-baker wrote:jpm wrote:How about the 1997 Lola?
But that livery is iconic in my opinion!
15 secs off the pace says otherwise
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
Sunshine_Baby_[IT] wrote:Am I the only one who likes 1997 Lola's livery?
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
dr-baker wrote:Sunshine_Baby_[IT] wrote:Am I the only one who likes 1997 Lola's livery?
No. You are not alone. And I am NOT INVOKING Baker's Law with that!!!
FMecha wrote:dr-baker wrote:Sunshine_Baby_[IT] wrote:Am I the only one who likes 1997 Lola's livery?
No. You are not alone. And I am NOT INVOKING Baker's Law with that!!!
I'd happily throw papaya to next person invoking the Law. Oh, and happy 7k posts, sir.
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?
pasta_maldonado wrote:Is there a partay?
redbulljack14 wrote:In reality, i'm probably getting pissed later, which is always as fun as a party.
Phoenix wrote:redbulljack14 wrote:In reality, i'm probably getting pissed later, which is always as fun as a party.
I hope you aren't talking literally
FMecha wrote:dr-baker wrote:Sunshine_Baby_[IT] wrote:Am I the only one who likes 1997 Lola's livery?
No. You are not alone. And I am NOT INVOKING Baker's Law with that!!!
I'd happily throw papaya to next person invoking the Law. Oh, and happy 7k posts, sir.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
Backmarker wrote:
A victim of unfortunate circumstances to some extent, the BMW Sauber Ferrari C29.
pasta_maldonado wrote:The stewards have recommended that Alan Jones learns to drive.
ibsey wrote:For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong.
pi314159 wrote:I think this livery still looks quite good compared to this year's. The most rejectful about the C29 was the name "BMW Sauber Ferrari".
Phoenix wrote:ibsey wrote:For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong.
Including the original British Racing Green Lotuses?
ibsey wrote:Phoenix wrote:ibsey wrote:For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong.
Including the original British Racing Green Lotuses?
Whoops. Completely forgot about those. Of course they were equally as brilliant as the JPS liveries. Actually, a former house mate of mine had Lotus Elise, complete with the original British Racing Green paint job & yellow strip down the middle. Even though it was worth much less, he still managed to pull more girls with that car, than another mate of ours who had a black Porsche 911 turbo!!! Probably because of the cool paint job, it had.
ibsey wrote:Phoenix wrote:ibsey wrote:For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong.
Including the original British Racing Green Lotuses?
Whoops. Completely forgot about those. Of course they were equally as brilliant as the JPS liveries. Actually, a former house mate of mine had a Lotus Elise, complete with the original British Racing Green paint job & yellow strip down the middle. Even though it was worth much less, he still managed to pull more girls with that car, than another mate of ours who had a black Porsche 911 turbo!!! Probably because of the cool paint job, it had.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
ibsey wrote:How about the Lotus 80?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lotus_80_2008_Silverstone_Classic.jpg
& the Lotus 81?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lotus81.jpg
For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong. However the Martini Livery is especially disappointing, considering the beautifully iconic Martini livery Lancia S4 Rally Cars (one of my fav all time cars!!! ) & the Lancia Group C Sports Cars.
Outside of F1; I'd like to nominate Jason Plato's 2012 MG car from the BTCC
http://www.motorward.com/2012/01/mg-returns-to-btcc-with-jason-plato/
That just looks like a complete mess to me.
ibsey wrote:For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong. However the Martini Livery is especially disappointing, considering the beautifully iconic Martini livery Lancia S4 Rally Cars (one of my fav all time cars!!! ) & the Lancia Group C Sports Cars.
midgrid wrote:ibsey wrote:For me any Lotus F1 cars without the JPS livery just seems wrong. However the Martini Livery is especially disappointing, considering the beautifully iconic Martini livery Lancia S4 Rally Cars (one of my fav all time cars!!! ) & the Lancia Group C Sports Cars.
I actually prefer the 1979-spec Lotus 79 in its Martini livery over the JPS version.
Everything's great.Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing I wouldn't be in Formula 1.
Phoenix wrote:This:
Properly executed Martini livery + mind-blowing chassis design = WIN.
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?
pasta_maldonado wrote:Phoenix wrote:This:
Properly executed Martini livery + mind-blowing chassis design = WIN.
Red and Martini is great, but white and Martini is just as good:
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?
darkapprentice77 wrote:
The '97 Tyrrell, just......bland.
Mexicola wrote:shinji wrote:Mexicola wrote: I'd rather listen to a dog lick its balls. Each to their own, I guess.
Does listening to a dog licking its balls get you excited?
That's between me and my internet service provider.
JJMonty wrote:The last Lotus liveries from 1992-1994 just ruined it's tradition of iconic colours... instead you had a car that was packed with lots of little sponsors... it meant the colours clashed badly! Shame because I really liked the shape of those cars, I would have liked to of seen the 1992 lotus with a colour scheme similar to their 1991 car, I think it would have looked a lot neater!
The same with Tyrrell, the majority of their cars in the 90's were one colour with a white stripe and lots of small sponsors... by 1997 you have a plain white car with nothing but nothing but sponsors (and a naked woman for GB... not that I'm complaining! ) If it wasn't for the Mild-Seven Sponsorship, I reckon the cars of 1994-1996 would have been just white! It saved their cars from having a complete reject theme in my opinion.
As for the C29... at least those colours have curves to give it a bit of a design, Sauber's livery for this year looks like they got a colour blind person who had an obsession with straight lines to create the livery! I do like the colours, but just having a "slab of grey here" and "another slab of grey there" makes it look very dated... not even a metalic finish or anything! If they continue to have Telemax sponsorship next year, I hope they start adding some of their blue into the scheme - I reckon that mixed in with the grey would look better!
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?