Your Reject of the Race - Australia

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1
User avatar
Shadaza
Posts: 2775
Joined: 05 Jun 2009, 23:49

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Shadaza »

Ben Purse wrote:Sergio Perez. How do you not finish in the points in a Mclaren with no car problems?

because the car is Shite? he was less than 1 second away from passing Grosjean who is in the vastly superior Lotus!

Red Bull's race pace deserves a mention, it was atrocious!
Message me on Discord.
User avatar
QuickYoda41
Posts: 1087
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 20:22

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by QuickYoda41 »

McLaren and Maldonado already mentioned, I have to go with race marshals and their blue flags waived basically for everyone.
User avatar
pi314159
Posts: 3661
Joined: 11 Aug 2012, 12:12

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by pi314159 »

Lots of contenders here:

Pirelli - These supersofts are rubbish, face it.
McLaren - Simply too slow.
Caterham - No visible progress since mid-2011.
Williams - especially Maldonado

I think Williams and McLaren should share the award, for moving backwards over the winter.
pasta_maldonado wrote:The stewards have recommended that Alan Jones learns to drive.
User avatar
TomWazzleshaw
Posts: 14370
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 04:42
Location: Curva do lel
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by TomWazzleshaw »

My nominations:

Pastor Maldonado - Decided to try arriving at turn 1 backwards, with predictable results. And he didn't even do a good enough job to bring out the Safety Car in the process.
Sauber - Hulkenberg's car crapped itself before the start and Gutierrez did literally nothing on his way to a lapped 13th place

But my reject of the race is:

McLaren F1 - If they were only slightly worried before, they must be in panic mode now as both cars were nearly a lap down by race end. They'll be lucky to be anywhere near the podium at the rate they're going.
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8114
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by mario »

East Londoner wrote:Where to start here?

Force India's Strategist - Brought Sutil in far too early for his final stop, costing him 5th,

The Reverend Maldolan - Picking up where he left 2012. :lol:

Pirelli - Clearly those super softs were made out of cheese.

But ROTR has to go to:

McLaren - Absolutely nowhere in the race. A grand total of two points.

I'd have to agree with your nomination of McLaren, as they were somewhat lucky to get those two points too - Grosjean spent a large chunk of the final stint right behind Button and finished barely a second behind him. Equally, although Perez was equally close to Grosjean - just 0.6s behind - Vergne nearly passed Perez too, as he finished just 0.5s behind Perez, so to a certain extent it looks like Button was backing those three drivers up into each other as the car simply wasn't fast enough. Whitmarsh has been persistently talking up the development potential of this car, but it's no good talking up the development potential when you're lucky to finish on the lead lap and scrape into the top 10.

To be fair to the Force India strategists, I can see why they thought that it was worth sending Sutil out on the super soft tyres for his final stint - in the opening stages of the race, the super soft tyres were able to last for a reasonable stretch of time (the Mercedes pair managed to get 13-14 laps out of their tyres on a fairly heavy fuel load), so it might not have seemed unreasonable to expect that, on lower fuel and with a rubbered in track, the tyres might have lasted for 15 laps. It's a shame that the tyres faded so quickly though, because it undercut what had been up until then had been a very impressive drive - still, it's a promising sign for Sutil (and one that should give Di Resta plenty to think about).

As a secondary nomination, I'd have to agree with the poor flag marshalling - why were the marshals persistently trying to blue flag Sutil when he was racing for position? Given that the drivers would have been relying more heavily than before on the marshals because of the persistent problems with the FIA's telemetry systems (which deserves an honorary mention for ROTR), that was rather poor form by the marshals for giving misleading information to the drivers.

Honourable mentions should also go out to the Williams duo - Maldonado ended up in the gravel trap, but despite a trouble free race Bottas was a very distant 14th and going nowhere fast. Sauber, too, deserve a mention - Hulkenberg didn't even start the race because of his car breaking down, whilst Gutierrez's pace was fairly dismal.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
WaffleCat
Posts: 2293
Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 13:02
Location: Singapore

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by WaffleCat »

Still think Race Control should get a mention,but my top pick has changed to...

...SuperSoft Tyres.Made out of tracing paper,those things.
My friend's USB drive spoiled, spilled tea on her laptop and had a bird poo in her hand.

What did she do in her past life to deserve this?

Signup for the Random Racing League, Season TWO!!!
User avatar
pasta_maldonado
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6448
Joined: 22 Apr 2012, 16:49
Location: Greater London. Sort of.

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by pasta_maldonado »

My nomination? McLaren-Mercedes. Absolutely godawful. So bad that I even caught Button frowning at one point....

Still, watch as Jenoch go totally left field and announce that the official ROTR is a duck that fell over in the rain yesterday :lol:
Klon wrote:more liek Nick Ass-idy amirite?
User avatar
girry
Posts: 838
Joined: 31 May 2012, 19:43

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by girry »

Pastor Maldonado...sandtraps oh why are they almost extinct from anywhere else
when you're dead people start listening
User avatar
andrew2209
Posts: 389
Joined: 31 Dec 2012, 19:31

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by andrew2209 »

Caterham-Slower than Marussia, despite getting the 10th place money from 2012, and for some of their (lack of) letting the leaders go by.
User avatar
Yannick
Posts: 1449
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:53

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Yannick »

Is there a possibility that the Reverend MacDonald and my pre-season championship hope Czeko Perez share the award this time around?
"I don't think we should be used to finance (the manufacturers') R&D because they will produce that engine anyway" said Monisha Kaltenborn.
"You will never see a Mercedes using a Ferrari engine or the other way round."
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5942
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Nuppiz »

Race organisation as a whole - first the telemetry problems, then the shall-we-or-shall-we-not qualifying, and finally waving blue flags to cars that were on the same lap.
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
User avatar
johnnyCarwash
Posts: 158
Joined: 15 Mar 2013, 00:19
Location: Under the old Dunlop bridge, Donington Park

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by johnnyCarwash »

ROTR for me was
Mclaren poor race and a diabolical Q2 decision

Honourable mentions:
Race control telemetry failure, messy qualifying and inappropriate blue flags

Maldonado makes rookies look like veterans
The ChiltonCraze at the British Grand Prix
FIA driver press conference announcer wrote:On pole position for his home grand prix for the first time, Max Chilton
User avatar
Vassago
Posts: 163
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 07:44
Location: Poland

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Vassago »

Maldonado's reckless style is old news and should be ignored.

McLaren win this hands down. From the fastest car in the last Grand Prix of 2012 to midpacker status in just 4,5 months! That takes some doing! 8-)
95 GP / 63 DNF / 5 pts
User avatar
DemocalypseNow
Posts: 13185
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 09:30
Location: Lost, send help
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by DemocalypseNow »

Tough one, there are quite a few strong candidates;

Williams - Propping up the back of the grid along with Marussia and Caterham. Abysmal performance once again from such an experienced team. The year ahead does not look positive at all.

Caterham - obliterated by Jules Bianchi, despite them having more prize money. A crap team with crap drivers. If any team doesn't deserve a place in F1, it's these guys. Utterly, utterly useless.

Race Control - non-functioning telemetry and giving everyone that isn't a Ferrari or Red Bull blue flags when on the same lap racing for position. The cancelled qualifying was understandable, the rest was not.

But the lot who really took the cake this weekend...

Vodafone McLaren Mercedes
What the hell was that? In qualifying, their strategy was absolutely awful, they screwed Perez with the dry tyres call, almost did the same thing to Button in the same session, and had the speed of a midfield team in the race. Perez was one of the easiest targets on the circuit for people to overtake, he was just so helpless out there. Williams may have been awful today, but they haven't been great for years now - whereas McLaren, coming off the back of a competitive season in 2012, have fallen very far since. It might be time to roll out the McLaren MP4-27B...
Novitopoli wrote:Everytime someone orders at Pizza Hut, an Italian dies.
Novitopoli wrote:Juve's Triplete: Calciopoli, doping & Mafia connections.

Image Image
X61
Posts: 12
Joined: 23 Apr 2011, 18:09

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by X61 »

Williams - Look to be back to their 2011 form, hopefully it's just a one off.
User avatar
James1978
Posts: 3044
Joined: 26 Jul 2010, 18:46
Location: Darlington, NE England

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by James1978 »

For drivers which haven't been said yet, I'll say Mark Webber (seriously learn how to start!!) and Grosjean (where on earth were you? Your teammate won the race!!).

It's certainly unlike Grosjean to be anonymous.

But overall it's just gotta be McLaren. Like 2004 and 2009, their base at which to start is so low it's unture.
"Poor old Warwick takes it from behind all throughout this season". :) (Tony Jardine, 1988)
User avatar
Aerospeed
Posts: 4948
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 18:58
Location: In too much snow right now

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Aerospeed »

Has to be McLaren, their race was just awful. Hope Perez's career doesn't go down the shitter because of this...
Mistakes in potatoes will ALWAYS happen :P
Trulli bad puns...
IN JAIL NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM
User avatar
Divina_Galica
Posts: 164
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 16:05

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Divina_Galica »

James1978 wrote:For drivers which haven't been said yet, I'll say Mark Webber (seriously learn how to start!!)


Can't believe you're the first to say Webber.

Most of the other nominations have excuses in the equipment they are using, eg Race-control (right descision in retrospect)/Caterham (bad car)/McLaren (maybe the 2013 car is the same as the 2012 Ferrari)/Sutil's tyres (maybe the mediums would have gone off in another couple of laps as well if he had delayed going onto super-softs) etc, but this one was fully down to the driver. In a top, top car, home event, new season and he goes backwards off the grid yet again.

I assumed that when Helmut Marko was critical of him it was actually a smart piece of psychology, (after all we don't really have any idea as to what the drivers are really like behind the smiley faces and PR stuff, and how they are motivated) but looks like I was just plain wrong....

DG
User avatar
Divina_Galica
Posts: 164
Joined: 21 Jan 2013, 16:05

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Divina_Galica »

...also can't believe that no-one has said Sauber.

At least all the other teams got their two cars onto the grid. How disappointed must the Hulk be, especially seeing two FI's in the points??

DG
User avatar
SeedStriker
Posts: 1288
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 19:51

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by SeedStriker »

Since McLaren is the easy way (way too troubled pre-season), i'll go with Pastor Maldonado, because he was all publicocrap all weekend only to be the one to bring back the retro kitty littter.

Dishonorable mentions to Pirelli's Supersofts for the one-lap wonder and then, rubbish and Catherham, or I should say Clatterham?
User avatar
Ataxia
Not Important
Posts: 6861
Joined: 23 Jun 2010, 12:47
Location: Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's)
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Ataxia »

Divina_Galica wrote:...also can't believe that no-one has said Sauber.

At least all the other teams got their two cars onto the grid. How disappointed must the Hulk be, especially seeing two FI's in the points??

DG


You can't really blame them too much; it was a technical issue that reared its head at an inopportune moment. Gutierrez was pretty anonymous, but if Hulkenberg had a working car he probably would have managed a 7th/8th place finish.
Mitch Hedberg wrote:I want to be a race car passenger: just a guy who bugs the driver. Say man, can I turn on the radio? You should slow down. Why do we gotta keep going in circles? Man, you really like Tide...
User avatar
Ferrim
Posts: 1922
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 21:45

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Ferrim »

I've got to stick to my early decision of Charlie Whiting. Not even starting qualifying at 17:00 was farcical any way I look at it (of course suspending it later because of the lack of light was the correct call, but they shouldn't have been forced to do it in the first place).

Still, McLaren and Williams have done great efforts to take the prize, and Webber's start was rejectful as well (and for the umpteenth time). But I can't agree with super-soft tyres as a nomination: they were supposed to last very little and give the top teams some headaches. It was a bit extreme, probably, but you can't always get it right, and the conditions didn't help at all, as it was colder and rainer than expected during the whole weekend. In more normal circumnstances the super-softs would have hold their own for more than 10 laps and everyone would have pitted just twice, a far cry from the four, five and six stops that some drivers were reporting during pre-season testing. Also, by default I prefer tyres that last too little to tyres that last too much.
Go home, Bernie Ecclestone!

"There will be no other victory this year, I can tell you, more welcomed than this one" Bob Varsha, 1995 Canadian GP

F1 Rejects Forums – going off-topic since 2009!
went
Posts: 112
Joined: 27 Mar 2011, 20:22
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by went »

3- Mark: Learn to start a car already!
2- Williams: The rookie did a terrible job, as usual, and Bottas didn't screw it up too badly but he was nowhere near anywhere. Disappointing.
1- McLaren: What in the name of hell was that. First swapping a useless set of supersofts for another useless set of supersofts on qualy. Then a pathetic race being nowhere. Two points when, last year, it was pole and win. Absolutely dreadful, they have a lot of catch-up left to do if they want this season to go anywhere.
User avatar
DemocalypseNow
Posts: 13185
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 09:30
Location: Lost, send help
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by DemocalypseNow »

Webber had an ECU failure which meant he had no KERS at the start. No wonder he fell back. I don't think he deserves ROTR because a component on his car failed...
Novitopoli wrote:Everytime someone orders at Pizza Hut, an Italian dies.
Novitopoli wrote:Juve's Triplete: Calciopoli, doping & Mafia connections.

Image Image
User avatar
rachel1990
Posts: 959
Joined: 29 Oct 2012, 20:21

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by rachel1990 »

It has to be Williams for me. Awful pace and almost got beaten by Marussia.

Mclaren come second for me for being awful and being beaten by both Force India's

And what the hell happened to Romain Grosjean? If this continues for the rest of the season and Jules Bianchi keeps going well, Jules may be going up the grid sooner rather than later.
Benetton of 1992. Never a reject
User avatar
DonTirri
Posts: 1177
Joined: 28 Apr 2009, 22:12
Location: Herttoniemi, Helsinki, Finland, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way.

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by DonTirri »

There really is but one option: Mclaren.

I mean seriously. Letting Hammy go was a huge mistake. Also, the car is shite.

But on a personal note: Everyone saying "Lolvettelwinslol" Before/during/After the race/qually. So quick to judge. So bitter. And so wrong ;)
I got Pointed Opinions and I ain't afraid to use em!
F1rejects no.1Räikkönen and Vettel fan.
BTW, thats Räikkönen with two K's and two N's. Not Raikonnen (Raikkonen is fine if you have no umlauts though)
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by CarlosFerreira »

For me it's Reverend Maldonado. Yes, the car looked difficult, but Maldonado looked amateurish all weekend. Williams messed up the tyre situation in Q1, but Bottas beat him - which led to him complaining about the team and the car to all and sunder. Never got close to Bottas in the race, and then had a first off in Turn 1 as Alonso was coming out of the pits. Was he distracted or something? Then there was the actual crash. Pathetic.

Shadaza wrote:Pirreli's Super Soft Tire.

I think it may be made of banana peels.


Yeah, they deserve a nomination. Total, utter bananas. There is no tyre management here: they come apart in a few laps regardless of what you do, and then you change to Mediums. Total farce.

Also, Sauber for the Hulkenberg situation - when was the last time we had a DNS?

Finally, Grosjean. He still looks spooked, and was nowhere most of the time. I genuinely think he's faster than Raikkonen, but he didn't show it today. Let's hope a steady race has done something to get him back in a good place.
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
User avatar
Aerospeed
Posts: 4948
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 18:58
Location: In too much snow right now

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Aerospeed »

CarlosFerreira wrote:Also, Sauber for the Hulkenberg situation - when was the last time we had a DNS?


Wasn't it Petrov at Silverstone last year? I think he had engine troubles on the formation lap.
Mistakes in potatoes will ALWAYS happen :P
Trulli bad puns...
IN JAIL NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM
User avatar
Salamander
Posts: 9570
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:59
Location: trapped on some prison island

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Salamander »

DonTirri wrote:But on a personal note: Everyone saying "Lolvettelwinslol" Before/during/After the race/qually. So quick to judge. So bitter. And so wrong ;)


Hey, if it means Vettel doesn't win, I'll happily take that. ;) And I believe it's actually spelled VETTELWINSLOL. [/nitpick] ;)

But honestly, McLaren were simply crap. No other word for it.
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing I wouldn't be in Formula 1.
Everything's great.
I'm not surprised about anything.
User avatar
Londoner
Posts: 6430
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 18:21
Location: Norwich, UK
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Londoner »

JeremyMcClean wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:Also, Sauber for the Hulkenberg situation - when was the last time we had a DNS?


Wasn't it Petrov at Silverstone last year? I think he had engine troubles on the formation lap.


It was a bit more than engine troubles. The Renault engine decided to detonate...on the outlap to the bloody grid! :lol:
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
User avatar
Dan B
Posts: 421
Joined: 09 May 2010, 21:18

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Dan B »

Lots of nominations for this one:
3) Williams: Bottas was anonymous, and just what is Maldonado doing? I don't know if something broke on the car or if that yellow line he crossed was that slick, but that was embarrassing. 1 step forward, 2 steps back for this team it seems. Let's hope Malaysia is better.

2) This is a tough one for me but I'm going to say Mark Webber. His starts are becoming more and more dangerous, and I think it's high time the FIA came in and said something. I seriously don't buy the story of the ECU failing; that to me sounds like David Coulthard's blunder in Adelaide 1995 and then blaming it on the pit limiter (or something). Second to seventh is laughable, and was trounced by Vettel during the race.

But the winner for me is:
McLaren. They're slow all around, and were shown up by both Mercedes and Force India. Button could only manage 9th, and Perez didn't finish in the points. Botched tire calls in Qualifying, and hopeless in race; is this seriously McLaren or a team masquerading as them?

Honorable mentions:
Race Control: Not for delaying qualifying; that was a smart move with cars going off every direction. Rather, this is for the terrible use of blue flags. Did I seriously see a blue flag waved at Vettel when he was racing for position? Oh, and not having working telemetry and DRS control is inexcusable in this sport.

Caterham: So we went from having a team with competent drivers (Kovalainen, Trulli, Petrov) and decent speed (granted, not enough for the points but it was genuine) to a team that is now HRT with money? Which is sad because Charles Pic does have talent but it's being wasted on him, just like Kovalainen, Trulli, and Petrov before him.
User avatar
AndreaModa
Posts: 5806
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 17:51
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by AndreaModa »

I'd personally say everyone shitting their pants at the thought of qualifying being delayed a bit.

But from the race, you'd have to say McLaren must be up there, though Jenson drove quite well in my view to at least salvage a few points and Perez was unlucky to not quite steal 10th off Grosjean at the end.

Williams, although not reported on as much, are in a similar situation to McLaren. Very poor pace and searching for answers. The fact Maldonado threw it in the gravel just confirmed he wasn't paying attention and had had enough for the day. Caterham look like they could have a bit of a tough year, I'd argue that without Chilton having to stop for a long while early on to fix his front wing, he may well have finished in front of Pic as the difference between the two by the end of the race was about 30 seconds which is roughly the time for an extended pit stop. VDG needs some time to settle in it seems, and he's quite far off the pace of Pic. It will be interesting to see what sort of improvement in the car there'll be when they bring that big upgrade package to Barcelona and whether they can get back ahead of Marussia. There were quite a few retirements today, and we know that those sort of races don't happen very often, so it's going to be crucial for both teams to try and maximise those opportunities, and today it went Marussia's way.
I want my MTV...Simtek Ford

My Motorsport Photos

@DNPQ_
User avatar
DOSBoot
Posts: 1638
Joined: 26 Dec 2010, 19:09
Location: Pensacola, Florida. United States.

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by DOSBoot »

This is a tough one, but I choose:

1. F1 Rejects Forum Users: Several of them constantly complaining about how race control screwed everything up, as well as eveyone perdicting that Vettel was going to cakewalk the race. Quit acting so childish okay!

2. Pirelli: The Super-Softs are useless. Get rid of them.
Proud supporter of the United States 2nd Amendment.

2012 Predicament Predictions Champion.
User avatar
James1978
Posts: 3044
Joined: 26 Jul 2010, 18:46
Location: Darlington, NE England

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by James1978 »

Yeah, I feel a bit bad about moaning about qualifying now. The drainage must have been pretty similar to Adelaide and look what happened in 1991. :(
"Poor old Warwick takes it from behind all throughout this season". :) (Tony Jardine, 1988)
User avatar
Londoner
Posts: 6430
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 18:21
Location: Norwich, UK
Contact:

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Londoner »

To be fair, most of the moaning (including mine) I guess was down to it being the first qualifying of the season after 5 months, and it was all spur of the moment posting. Sorry people. :(
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
Peter
Posts: 780
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 00:45
Location: Kingston, Jamaica

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Peter »

McLaren - Presumably costing themselves a fast car to make Button more comfortable. Whopping total of 2 points, nothing like the 40 points they netted here a year ago.
"The FIA's implementation of penalties is about as effective as that of the English football team."
DidNotQualify
Posts: 30
Joined: 10 Mar 2013, 20:52

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by DidNotQualify »

Well, my earlier nomination of Caterham after Q1 wasn't too far off in the end - Bianchi comprehensively outclassed both of them and they appear to have fallen back quite a long way from where they were in Brazil.

But there is surely no looking past McLaren for this prestigious award - which they haven't won for 10 years. It's early days yet, of course, but their current situation has overtones of 2004 - a fast car at the end of the previous season squandered as they try to go too radical and end up miles off the pace, despite very few rule changes. At least the current car doesn't grenade itself every five minutes.
User avatar
Barbazza
Posts: 1639
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 19:30

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Barbazza »

I expected McLaren to be rubbish. So on that basis I'll say Maldonado - on a day when all the rookies at least finished, he was the only one spinning out like a rookie.
User avatar
Nessafox
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6242
Joined: 30 Nov 2009, 19:45
Location: Stupid, sexy Flanders.

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by Nessafox »

I think Bruce McLaren is turning in his grave right now. The thing is that McLaren doesn't seem to know why they are so slow (unlike Caterham,who just didn't develop enough), However Williams has the same problems as McLaren, but also have the problem that is Maldonado's consistency level.
I don't know what i want and i want it now!
User avatar
shinji
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4007
Joined: 18 May 2009, 17:02
Location: Hibernia

Re: Your Reject of the Race - Australia

Post by shinji »

At least last year McLaren had a good car, and they sabotaged themselves with poor strategy calls and mistakes. This year they have both a lack of professionalism (slick tyres in Q2 debacle) and a terrible car. Poor Sergio should have stayed at Sauber, he was safe there.

McLaren miss Dennis' clinical precision more every year, and on that rather broad basis they'd be my ROTR.
Better than 'Tour in a suit case' Takagi.
Post Reply